Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29699095›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology2011

Chromosomal integrity and DNA damage in freeze-dried spermatozoa.

Hirokazu Kusakabe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hirokazu KusakabeDepartment of Biological Sciences Asahikawa Medical University 2-1-1-1 Midorigaoka-higashi 078-8510 Asahikawa Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freeze-drying technology may one day be used to preserve mammalian spermatozoa indefinitely without cryopreservation. Freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa stored below 4°C for up to 1 year have maintained the ability to fertilize oocytes and support normal development. The maximum storage period for spermatozoa increases at lower storage temperatures. Freeze-drying, per se, may reduce the integrity of chromosomes in freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa, but induction of chromosomal damage is suppressed if spermatozoa are incubated with divalent cation chelating agents prior to freeze-drying. Nevertheless, chromosomal damage does accumulate in spermatozoa stored at temperatures above 4°C. Currently, no established methods or strategies can prevent or reduce damage accumulation, and damage accumulation during storage is a serious obstacle to advances in freeze-drying technology. Chromosomal integrity of freeze-dried human spermatozoa have roughly background levels of chromosomal damage after storage at 4°C for 1 month, but whether these spermatozoa can produce healthy newborns is unknown. The safety of using freeze-dried human spermatozoa must be evaluated based on the risks of heritable chromosome and DNA damage that accumulates during storage.

Indexed as

ChromosomeCryopreservationDNA damageFreeze‐dryingSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID29699095
PMCPMC5907138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.