Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29698863›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2018

Development and validation of a sensitive LC MS/MS method for the measurement of the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor prexasertib and its application in a cerebral microdialysis study.

Bo Zhong, Anil Maharaj, Abigail Davis, Martine F Roussel, Clinton F Stewart

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CNS penetration and pharmacodynamics of the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib in a mouse Group 3 medulloblastoma model.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo ZhongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Anil MaharajDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Abigail DavisDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Martine F RousselDepartment of Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Clinton F StewartDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States. Electronic address: clinton.stewart@stjude.org.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
The DNA Damage Response and Tumorigenesis in the BrainP01CA096832 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, SUZANNE J. · 2003 to 2025
$38.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA096832NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LC MS/MS methods to measure prexasertib in mouse plasma and Ringer's solution containing 0.5% BSA (Ringer's/BSA) were developed and validated. Liquid-liquid extraction with tert-butyl methyl ether was used to extract prexasertib from mouse plasma and Ringer's/BSA. Reverse phase chromatography with gradient elution was performed to separate prexasertib from the endogenous interference in the matrix, followed by MS detection using positive ion MRM mode. The initial calibration curve for mouse plasma samples ranged from 1 to 500 ng/ml, and after validation of that curve and use in a preliminary study another calibration curve (0.2-200 ng/ml) was created to enable the quantitation of prexasertib at lower concentrations. The method described was precise and accurate with %CV in precision studies of ≤ 6.7% and accuracies within 95.0-110% of nominal target concentration across all concentrations tested for both matrices. This validated method was successfully applied in the analysis of prexasertib in mouse plasma and dialysate samples collected during a cerebral microdialysis study.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCalibrationCerebellar NeoplasmsCheckpoint Kinase 1ChildChromatography, LiquidChromatography, Reverse-PhaseDialysis SolutionsFemaleHumansLimit of DetectionLiquid-Liquid ExtractionMedulloblastomaMiceCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanDialysis SolutionsprexasertibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazinesPyrazolesChk1LC–MS/MSLiquid-liquid extractionMicrodialysisPrexasertibRinger’s solution

Identifiers

PMID29698863
PMCPMC5984718
OpenAlexW2799630561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.