ArticlePLoS pathogens2018
How to combat emerging artemisinin resistance: Lessons from "The Three Little Pigs".
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and drug resistance molecular markers: A systematic review of clinical studies from two malaria endemic regions - India and sub-Saharan Africa.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2021Pooled it
- A review on molecular markers ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025Review
- Protecting future antimalarials from the trap of resistance: Lessons from artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) failures.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2021Review
- Studies of the Parasite-Midgut Interaction RevealFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- The resistome and genomic reconnaissance in the age of malaria elimination.Disease models & mechanisms · 2019Review
- An Overview of Drug Resistance in Protozoal Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Clinical impact of the two ART resistance markers, K13 gene mutations and DPC3 in Vietnam.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is rare to come across an Aesop's fable in respectable journals. It might catch scientists outside the malaria field by surprise to learn that the famous story of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" has been repeatedly compared to the threat from artemisinin-resistant malaria parasites, including the two latest reports on the rise of a specific haplotype in Cambodia and Thailand, sensationally dubbed "Super Malaria" by the media [1, 2]. The comparison to a children's tale should not negate the fact that malaria drug resistance is one of the most pressing threats to the global public health community. Here, the findings leading to this contentious discourse will be delineated in order to provide a perspective. Possible solutions will be presented to stimulate further research and discussion to solve one of the greatest public health challenges of our lifetime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.