Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29698493›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

One-step estimation of networked population size: Respondent-driven capture-recapture with anonymity.

Bilal Khan, Hsuan-Wei Lee, Ian Fellows, Kirk Dombrowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bilal KhanDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8823-6752
Hsuan-Wei LeeDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
Ian FellowsFellow Statistics, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Kirk DombrowskiDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9185-0240

Funding

Injection Risk Networks in Rural Puerto RicoR01DA037117 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI DOMBROWSKI, KIRK, KHAN, BILAL · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
Measuring Social Behavior via Dynamic Network InteractionR01GM118427 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI DOMBROWSKI, KIRK · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037117NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118427NIH HHS R01 DA037117NIH HHS R01 GM118427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Size estimation is particularly important for populations whose members experience disproportionate health issues or pose elevated health risks to the ambient social structures in which they are embedded. Efforts to derive size estimates are often frustrated when the population is hidden or hard-to-reach in ways that preclude conventional survey strategies, as is the case when social stigma is associated with group membership or when group members are involved in illegal activities. This paper extends prior research on the problem of network population size estimation, building on established survey/sampling methodologies commonly used with hard-to-reach groups. Three novel one-step, network-based population size estimators are presented, for use in the context of uniform random sampling, respondent-driven sampling, and when networks exhibit significant clustering effects. We give provably sufficient conditions for the consistency of these estimators in large configuration networks. Simulation experiments across a wide range of synthetic network topologies validate the performance of the estimators, which also perform well on a real-world location-based social networking data set with significant clustering. Finally, the proposed schemes are extended to allow them to be used in settings where participant anonymity is required. Systematic experiments show favorable tradeoffs between anonymity guarantees and estimator performance. Taken together, we demonstrate that reasonable population size estimates are derived from anonymous respondent driven samples of 250-750 individuals, within ambient populations of 5,000-40,000. The method thus represents a novel and cost-effective means for health planners and those agencies concerned with health and disease surveillance to estimate the size of hidden populations. We discuss limitations and future work in the concluding section.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCluster AnalysisHumansMarkov ChainsPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID29698493
PMCPMC5919671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.