ArticlePloS one2018
Dose gradient curve: A new tool for evaluating dose gradient.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated dose-gradient curve and dose-volume histogram analysis platform: development, validation, and clinical decision support with TG-119 datasets.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Automated evaluation of organ sparing in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy using dose-gradient metrics.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Dosimetric Comparison of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Planning Techniques with Apex 2.5mm and Agility 5mm Multileaf Collimator for Intracranial Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- A Visualization and Radiation Treatment Plan Quality Scoring Method for Triage in a Population-Based Context.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Application of dose-gradient function in reducing radiation induced lung injury in breast cancer radiotherapy.Journal of X-ray science and technology · 2024Article
- Isodose surface differences: A novel tool for the comparison of dose distributions.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- An analytical expression for R50% dependent on PTV surface area and volume: A cranial SRS comparison.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Individualized automated planning for dose bath reduction in robotic radiosurgery for benign tumors.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- A Beam-Specific Optimization Target Volume for Stereotactic Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- Dose-Gradient Function-Guided Reduction of Radiation-Induced Heart Injury in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Treated With Helical Tomotherapy After Mastectomy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStereotactic radiotherapy, which delivers an ablative high radiation dose to a target volume for maximum local tumor control, requires a rapid dose fall-off outside the target volume to prevent extensive damage to nearby normal tissue. Currently, there is no tool to comprehensively evaluate the dose gradient near the target volume. We propose the dose gradient curve (DGC) as a new tool to evaluate the quality of a treatment plan with respect to the dose fall-off characteristics.
methodsThe average distance between two isodose surfaces was represented by the dose gradient index (DGI) estimated by a simple equation using the volume and surface area of isodose levels. The surface area was calculated by mesh generation and surface triangulation. The DGC was defined as a plot of the DGI of each dose interval as a function of the dose. Two types of DGCs, differential and cumulative, were generated. The performance of the DGC was evaluated using stereotactic radiosurgery plans for virtual targets.
resultsOver the range of dose distributions, the dose gradient of each dose interval was well-characterized by the DGC in an easily understandable graph format. Significant changes in the DGC were observed reflecting the differences in planning situations and various prescription doses.
conclusionsThe DGC is a rational method for visualizing the dose gradient as the average distance between two isodose surfaces; the shorter the distance, the steeper the dose gradient. By combining the DGC with the dose-volume histogram (DVH) in a single plot, the DGC can be utilized to evaluate not only the dose gradient but also the target coverage in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.