ArticlePloS one2018
The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consistency as the Currency in Psychological Measures: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10 and K-6).Depression and anxiety · 2024Pooled it
- Promoting Recovery from Disasters, Pandemics, and Trauma: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions to Reduce Distress in Adults, Children, and Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Mental health outcomes of a peer support programme for prosthesis and orthosis users in Cambodia: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Kessler 10 measure of psychosocial distress using the 2022 South African population-based household survey.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea Risk and Mental Health Conditions Among Older Canadian Adults in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Miles and Maternity: A Survey of Long-Duration Exercise During Pregnancy.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Prevalence of stress and its associated factors among intern physicians in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Conditioned pain modulation elicited through manual pressure techniques on the cervical spine: a crossover study.Pain reports · 2025Article
- Transformational leadership, well-being, morale, and readiness: The mediating role of empowerment.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025Article
- Evaluation of psychological status in early-stage breast cancer outpatients: a cross-sectional study utilizing the Kessler 10 Scale.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- A six-week group program of emotion focused family therapy for parents of children with mental health challenges: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Validation of a short form of the perceptions of interparental conflict in childhood.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Psychological distress is associated with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: 2021-2023.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Psychological distress among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: patterns over time.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in a Sample of Adolescents from Ecuador.Child psychiatry and human development · 2024Article
- Social mobility and mental health in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024Article
- Enhancing patient well-being in oncology waiting rooms: a pilot field experiment on the emotional impact of virtual forest therapy.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Factors associated with increased risk of playing-related disorders among classical music students within the Risk of Music Students (RISMUS) longitudinal study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prevalence and determinants of opioid use disorder among long-term opiate users in Golestan Cohort Study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The psychometric properties of the ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) have been extensively explored in civilian populations. However, documentation of its psychometric properties in military populations is limited, and there is no universally accepted cut-off score on the K10 to distinguish clinical vs. sub-clinical levels of distress. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the K10 in Canadian Armed Forces personnel. Data on 6700 Regular Forces personnel were obtained from the 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey. The internal consistency and factor structure of the K10 (range, 0-40) were examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to select optimal cut-offs for the K10, using the presence/absence of any of four past-month disorders as the outcome (posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive episode, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder). Cronbach's alpha (0.88) indicated a high level of internal consistency of the K10. Results from CFA indicated that a single-factor 10-item construct had an acceptable overall fit: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05; 90% confidence interval (CI):0.05-0.06, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.99, weighted root mean square residual (WRMR) = 2.06. K10 scores were strongly associated with both the presence and recency of all four measured disorders. The area under the ROC curve was 0.92, demonstrating excellent predictive value for past-30-day disorders. A K10 score of 10 or greater was optimal for screening purposes (sensitivity = 86%; specificity = 83%), while a score of 17 or greater (sensitivity = 53%; specificity = 97%) was optimal for prevalence estimation of clinically significant psychological distress, in that it resulted in equal numbers of false positives and false negatives. Our results suggest that K10 scale has satisfactory psychometric properties for use as a measure of non-specific psychological distress in the military population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.