Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29698424›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) production in an integrated electromicrobial setup: Investigation under stress-inducing conditions.

Israa Salem Al Rowaihi, Alexis Paillier, Shahid Rasul, Ram Karan, Stefan Wolfgang Grötzinger, Kazuhiro Takanabe, Jörg Eppinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrocatalytic COChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Biohybrid COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. CyanobacteriumBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. From COChemSusChem · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Israa Salem Al RowaihiKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Alexis PaillierKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Shahid RasulKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ram KaranKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Stefan Wolfgang GrötzingerTechnical University of Munich, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Garching, Germany.
Kazuhiro TakanabeKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5374-9451
Jörg EppingerKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SATechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), a biodegradable polymer, can be produced by different microorganisms. The PHB belongs to the family of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) that mostly accumulates as a granule in the cytoplasm of microorganisms to store carbon and energy. In this study, we established an integrated one-pot electromicrobial setup in which carbon dioxide is reduced to formate electrochemically, followed by sequential microbial conversion into PHB, using the two model strains, Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 and Cupriavidus necator H16. This setup allows to investigate the influence of different stress conditions, such as coexisting electrolysis, relatively high salinity, nutrient limitation, and starvation, on the production of PHB. The overall PHB production efficiency was analyzed in reasonably short reaction cycles typically as short as 8 h. As a result, the PHB formation was detected with C. necator H16 as a biocatalyst only when the electrolysis was operated in the same solution. The specificity of the source of PHB production is discussed, such as salinity, electricity, concurrent hydrogen production, and the possible involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS).

Indexed as

Electrochemical TechniquesCarbon DioxideChromatography, GasCupriavidus necatorElectrodesElectrolysisFormatesHydrogenHydroxybutyratesMetal NanoparticlesMethylobacterium extorquensOxidation-ReductionPolyestersPolyhydroxybutyratesReactive Oxygen SpeciesCarbon DioxideFormatesformic acidHydrogenHydroxybutyratespoly-beta-hydroxybutyratePolyestersPolyhydroxybutyratesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID29698424
PMCPMC5919402
OpenAlexW2800888211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.