ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
RIDDLE: Race and ethnicity Imputation from Disease history with Deep LEarning.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Handling Missing Race and Ethnicity in an EHR-Based Study Through Integration of Individual Measures and Neighborhood Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Measures.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Invited commentary: deep learning-methods to amplify epidemiologic data collection and analyses.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- A multi-constraint Monte Carlo Simulation approach to downscaling cancer data.Health & place · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in respiratory care: perspectives on critical opportunities and challenges.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Review
- Missing Race and Ethnicity Data in Pediatric Studies.JAMA pediatrics · 2024Article
- Computational Methods Summarizing Mutational Patterns in Cancer: Promise and Limitations for Clinical Applications.Cancers · 2023Review
- Multiple Imputation of Missing Race and Ethnicity in CDC COVID-19 Case-Level Surveillance Data.International journal of statistics in medical research · 2022Article
- QAUST: Protein Function Prediction Using Structure Similarity, Protein Interaction, and Functional Motifs.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Inferring Personalized and Race-Specific Causal Effects of Genomic Aberrations on Gleason Scores: A Deep Latent Variable Model.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Anonymized electronic medical records are an increasingly popular source of research data. However, these datasets often lack race and ethnicity information. This creates problems for researchers modeling human disease, as race and ethnicity are powerful confounders for many health exposures and treatment outcomes; race and ethnicity are closely linked to population-specific genetic variation. We showed that deep neural networks generate more accurate estimates for missing racial and ethnic information than competing methods (e.g., logistic regression, random forest, support vector machines, and gradient-boosted decision trees). RIDDLE yielded significantly better classification performance across all metrics that were considered: accuracy, cross-entropy loss (error), precision, recall, and area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic plots (all p < 10-9). We made specific efforts to interpret the trained neural network models to identify, quantify, and visualize medical features which are predictive of race and ethnicity. We used these characterizations of informative features to perform a systematic comparison of differential disease patterns by race and ethnicity. The fact that clinical histories are informative for imputing race and ethnicity could reflect (1) a skewed distribution of blue- and white-collar professions across racial and ethnic groups, (2) uneven accessibility and subjective importance of prophylactic health, (3) possible variation in lifestyle, such as dietary habits, and (4) differences in background genetic variation which predispose to diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.