Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29698401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effect of population density of lettuce intercropped with rocket on productivity and land-use efficiency.

Camila Seno Nascimento, Arthur Bernardes Cecílio Filho, Juan Waldir Mendoza-Cortez, Carolina Seno Nascimento, Francisco Bezerra Neto, Leilson Costa Grangeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camila Seno NascimentoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Plant Production, Campus Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arthur Bernardes Cecílio FilhoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Plant Production, Campus Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6706-5496
Juan Waldir Mendoza-CortezUniversidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Fitotecnia. Av. La Molina s/n, La Molina, Lima, PerúVEE.
Carolina Seno NascimentoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Plant Production, Campus Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco Bezerra NetoUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Department of Plant Sciences, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Leilson Costa GrangeiroUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Department of Plant Sciences, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the spacing of lettuce rows on the production of a lettuce-rocket intercropping system over two growing seasons (11 August to 25 September 2011 and 12 January to 24 February 2012) in Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil. We evaluated 11 treatments in each season: lettuce-rocket intercrops with five row spacings for the lettuce (0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35 and 0.40 m) and the rocket planted midway between the lettuce rows, sole crops of lettuce at the same five row spacings and a sole crop of rocket. Fresh and dry masses of the lettuce and rocket and number of lettuce leaves per plant were highest with a lettuce row spacing of 0.40 m, but the productivities of the lettuce and rocket were higher with a lettuce row spacing of 0.20 m. The productivities and fresh and dry weights of the lettuce and rocket and the number of lettuce leaves per plant were highest in the sole crops, but the fresh and dry weights of the rocket were higher with intercropping. The land equivalent ratios were >1.0 in both seasons in all intercrops and were highest for the densest crop (1.41). Intercropping was therefore 41% more efficient than sole cropping for the production of lettuce and rocket.

Indexed as

BiomassCrop ProductionCrops, AgriculturalLactucaPlant LeavesSeasons

Identifiers

PMID29698401
PMCPMC5919433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.