ArticlePLoS biology2018
Human white matter and knowledge representation.
Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the reliability of brain age algorithms under varying degrees of participant motion.Brain informatics · 2024Article
- Rehabilitating homonymous visual field deficits: white matter markers of recovery-stage 1 registered report.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Probing multiple algorithms to calculate brain age: Examining reliability, relations with demographics, and predictive power.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Quantifying numerical and spatial reliability of hippocampal and amygdala subdivisions in FreeSurfer.Brain informatics · 2023Article
- Edges in brain networks: Contributions to models of structure and function.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Review
- Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- The visual white matter connecting human area prostriata and the thalamus is retinotopically organized.Brain structure & function · 2020Article
- Functionally defined white matter of the macaque monkey brain reveals a dorso-ventral attention network.eLife · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how knowledge is represented in the human brain is a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. To date, most of the work on this topic has focused on knowledge representation in cortical areas and debated whether knowledge is represented in a distributed or localized fashion. Fang and colleagues provide evidence that brain connections and the white matter supporting such connections might play a significant role. The work opens new avenues of investigation, breaking through disciplinary boundaries across network neuroscience, computational neuroscience, cognitive science, and classical lesion studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.