ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019
Variation of T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transverse Relaxation Time Constant of Cystathionine in Human Glioma at 3 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- TE optimization for J-difference editing of 2-hydroxyglutarate at 3T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Concentric Ring Trajectory Sampling With k-Space Reordering Enables Assessment of Tissue-Specific TNMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Similar Theory of Mind Deficits in Community Dwelling Older Adults with Vascular Risk Profile and Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: The Case of Paradoxical Sarcasm Comprehension.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Hyperglycemia associated with acute brain injury in neonatal encephalopathy.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Article
- Cognitive Impairments and Associated Structural Brain Changes in Metabolic Syndrome and Implications of Neurocognitive Intervention.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetabolite concentrations are fundamental biomarkers of disease and prognosis. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a noninvasive method for measuring metabolite concentrations; however, quantitation is affected by T PURPOSE: To estimate T STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Twenty-seven pediatric brain tumor patients (n = 17 pilocytic astrocytoma and n = 10 medulloblastoma) and 24 age-matched normal controls. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Short- (30 msec) and long-echo (135 msec) single-voxel MRS acquired at 1.5T. ASSESSMENT: T STATISTICAL TESTS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks were used to analyze the mean T
resultsThe mean T DATA
conclusionDifferences exist in water and metabolite T LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:195-203.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.