Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29697775›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Cortical Afferents of Area 10 in Cebus Monkeys: Implications for the Evolution of the Frontal Pole.

Marcello G P Rosa, Juliana G M Soares, Tristan A Chaplin, Piotr Majka, Sophia Bakola, Kimberley A Phillips, David H Reser, Ricardo Gattass

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of prefrontal cortex.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain connectomes come of age.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Marcello G P RosaDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Juliana G M SoaresPrograma de Neurobiologia, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tristan A ChaplinDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Piotr MajkaDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Sophia BakolaDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Kimberley A PhillipsDepartment of Psychology, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX, USA.
David H ReserDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Ricardo GattassPrograma de Neurobiologia, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Australian Research Council · AUUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRTexas Biomedical Research Institute · US

Funding

The Southwest National Primate Research Center Supplement- Infrastructure improvements of ABSL2 holding areasP51OD011133 · OD · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Larry S. Schlesinger · 2012 to 2026
$129.7M
Structural and functional brain changes associated with motor learningR15NS090296 · NINDS · TRINITY UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, KIMBERLEY ANN · 2016 to 2016
$343k
NIH HHS P51 OD011133NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS090296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Area 10, located in the frontal pole, is a unique specialization of the primate cortex. We studied the cortical connections of area 10 in the New World Cebus monkey, using injections of retrograde tracers in different parts of this area. We found that injections throughout area 10 labeled neurons in a consistent set of areas in the dorsolateral, ventrolateral, orbital, and medial parts of the frontal cortex, superior temporal association cortex, and posterior cingulate/retrosplenial region. However, sites on the midline surface of area 10 received more substantial projections from the temporal lobe, including clear auditory connections, whereas those in more lateral parts received >90% of their afferents from other frontal areas. This difference in anatomical connectivity reflects functional connectivity findings in the human brain. The pattern of connections in Cebus is very similar to that observed in the Old World macaque monkey, despite >40 million years of evolutionary separation, but lacks some of the connections reported in the more closely related but smaller marmoset monkey. These findings suggest that the clearer segregation observed in the human frontal pole reflects regional differences already present in early simian primates, and that overall brain mass influences the pattern of cortico-cortical connectivity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAfferent PathwaysAnimalsCebusFemaleFrontal LobeGyrus CinguliMaleNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesNeuronsTemporal Lobeconnectionsfrontopolar cortexNew World monkeyprefrontal cortexsuperior temporal cortex

Identifiers

PMID29697775
PMCPMC6676977
OpenAlexW2802588759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.