ArticleInternational dental journal2018
A simple self-report health assessment questionnaire to identify oral diseases.
Article in International dental journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-Reported Items That Predict the Risk of Oral Health Deterioration and the Need for Dental Referral in Older People: A Systematic Review.Gerodontology · 2025Pooled it
- Longitudinal shifts in oral microbiome composition and metabolic pathways associated with preterm birth.mSystems · 2026Article
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients' Self-perception of Periodontal Diseases.European journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Clustering of Signs and Symptoms of Oral Diseases in a Colombian Population.International dental journal · 2023Article
- A new comprehensive oral health literacy scale: development and psychometric evaluation.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- Optimal Examination Sites for Periodontal Disease Evaluation: Applying the Item Response Theory Graded Response Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne approach to addressing oral health disparities for at-risk populations has been to increase discussion of oral health by non-dental healthcare providers. This study examined the accuracy of a simple instrument to detect individuals with a history of dental disease, which would then allow referral for an oral health evaluation. MATERIALS AND
methodsA two-question instrument was evaluated for the relationship to oral diseases, periodontal disease, and decayed, missing and filled teeth in 391 individuals seen in a dental school clinic for non-emergent dental care over a 3-month period. Clinical dental findings were used as outcome variables. The oral health parameters were dichotomised, using different levels of disease severity. The criteria were increased and decreased in an effort to test the robustness of our method.
resultsWhile the sensitivity outcomes with one question alone showed significant ability to predict oral disease (59-71%), the addition of a second self-assessment question increased the sensitivity (76-91%) for all oral health parameters studied. As the criteria for oral disease increased so did the sensitivity of this instrument.
conclusionThe results presented here offer evidence that a simple two-item questionnaire is an efficient and effective method of detecting populations at-risk for oral diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.