Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696448›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2018

Temporal Modulation Detection Depends on Sharpness of Spatial Tuning.

Ning Zhou, Matthew Cadmus, Lixue Dong, Juliana Mathews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ning ZhouDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA. zhoun@ecu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-679X
Matthew CadmusDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Lixue DongDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Juliana MathewsDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.

Funding

Assessing non-invasive measures of neural health in cochlear implant users and the clinical implicationsR03DC014771 · NIDCD · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, NING · 2016 to 2018
$432k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC014771-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research has shown that in electrical hearing, cochlear implant (CI) users' speech recognition performance is related in part to their ability to detect temporal modulation (i.e., modulation sensitivity). Previous studies have also shown better speech recognition when selectively stimulating sites with good modulation sensitivity rather than all stimulation sites. Site selection based on channel interaction measures, such as those using imaging or psychophysical estimates of spread of neural excitation, has also been shown to improve speech recognition. This led to the question of whether temporal modulation sensitivity and spatial selectivity of neural excitation are two related variables. In the present study, CI users' modulation sensitivity was compared for sites with relatively broad or narrow neural excitation patterns. This was achieved by measuring temporal modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) at stimulation sites that were significantly different in their sharpness of the psychophysical spatial tuning curves (PTCs) and measuring MDTs at the same sites in monopolar (MP) and bipolar (BP) stimulation modes. Nine postlingually deafened subjects implanted with Cochlear Nucleus® device took part in the study. Results showed a significant correlation between the sharpness of PTCs and MDTs, indicating that modulation detection benefits from a more spatially restricted neural activation pattern. There was a significant interaction between stimulation site and mode. That is, using BP stimulation only improved MDTs at stimulation sites with broad PTCs but had no effect or sometimes a detrimental effect on MDTs at stimulation sites with sharp PTCs. This interaction could suggest that a criterion number of nerve fibers is needed to achieve optimal temporal resolution, and, to achieve optimized speech recognition outcomes, individualized selection of site-specific current focusing strategies may be necessary. These results also suggest that the removal of stimulation sites measured with poor MDTs might improve both temporal and spectral resolution.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedfocused stimulationmodulation detection thresholdspsychophysical tuning curvesspatial selectivity of neural excitationstimulation modestimulation rate

Identifiers

PMID29696448
PMCPMC5962478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.