Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696424›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Survivorship care models for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Yu Ke, Terence Ng, Alexandre Chan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04660188 (Impact of a Breast cAncer Survivorship Interprofessional Community Care Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04660188 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Breast cAncer Survivorship Interprofessional Community Care Model (BASIC): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Centre, SingaporeRan2021 to 2022Enrolled70ConditionsSurvivorship, Breast CancerArmsMultidisciplinary collaborative care arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Opportunities to improve quality of care for cancer survivors in primary care: findings from the BETTER WISE study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health Care Transitions Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The untold story of late effects: a qualitative analysis of breast cancer survivors' emotional responses to late effects.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Cancer survivorship care during COVID-19-perspectives and recommendations from the MASCC survivorship study group.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu KeDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Blk S4A level 3, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Terence NgDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Blk S4A level 3, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Alexandre ChanDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Blk S4A level 3, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. phaac@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWell-elucidated survivorship care models are pertinent in the long-term management of cancer survivors. This review aims to update existing literature and evaluate the key components of such models with a focus on breast, colorectal, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors.

methodsThe PubMed electronic database were searched comprehensively for relevant publications in English through February 2017. Additional manual searches were conducted for reference lists and official guidelines published by oncology societies. Included studies addressed the correct cancer type, elaborated on each model's structure and provided patient-related outcome data to support its model's effectiveness if applicable.

resultsAmong the 25 included studies, six articles described survivorship models applicable to all cancer types, and the remaining focused on breast cancer (n = 10), colorectal cancer (n = 3), and AYA cancer survivors (n = 6). Shared-care model was largely described for all cancer types whereas multidisciplinary model predominated for AYA cancer survivors. Upon evaluation, these models described the essential components of survivorship care fairly well except for the care coordination component. Also, the definition of time points of care was vague and noncomprehensive.

conclusionThe reviewed survivorship model studies were comprehensive but were limited by a lack of existing rigorous evaluation efforts to assess their effectiveness. This review further provided valuable recommendations for future methodological evaluation of such models. This review has highlighted care coordination as an area for improvement and emphasized the importance of obtaining data on the effectiveness of these survivorship models to ensure satisfactory quality of life and health outcomes.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsQuality of LifeSurvivorshipAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAdolescents and young adultsBreast cancerCancer survivorsColorectal cancerSurvivorship model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.