Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696390›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2018

Treatment costs and cost drivers among osteoporotic fracture patients in Japan: a retrospective database analysis.

Yurie Taguchi, Yuta Inoue, Taichi Kido, Nobuhiro Arai

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Burden of accumulating fragility fractures on health service usage and costs among post-menopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Real-world evaluation of osteoporotic fractures using the Japan Medical Data Vision database.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cost effectiveness of romosozumab versus teriparatide for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis in Japan.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Aging and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yurie TaguchiAmgen Astellas BioPharma K.K, 1-7-12 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta InoueDeloitte Tohmatsu Consulting LLC, 3-3-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan. yutinoue@tohmatsu.co.jp.
Taichi KidoDeloitte Tohmatsu Consulting LLC, 3-3-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhiro AraiDeloitte Tohmatsu Consulting LLC, 3-3-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study estimated the direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures from a large claim database in Japan. We further identified several comorbidities which drove the treatment costs. The results would contribute to health economic analysis as well as understanding of individual financial burden in Japan.

introductionThe purposes of this study were to estimate treatment costs of osteoporotic fractures and to investigate the cost drivers.

methodsMale and female patients aged 50 years and older with a hip, vertebral, or non-hip/non-vert (NHNV) fracture between April 2008 and December 2016 were analyzed from claim database. Two types of costs were estimated. The incremental yearly costs of fractures and comorbidity treatments (total medical costs) were calculated by subtracting pre-fracture costs from post-fracture costs. The costs exclusive for fracture treatments (fracture treatment costs) were estimated by summing up the costs of fracture treatments within 1 year after fracture. The associations between comorbidities and costs were examined with a generalized linear model.

resultsTotal 12,898 patients were identified (83% was female). The total medical costs of fractures were $14,592 for male-hip, $15,691 for female-hip, $4268 for male-vertebral, $3819 for female-vertebral, $3790 for male-NHNV, and $4259 for female-NHNV. The fracture treatment costs were $4506 for male-hip, $5427 for female-hip, $1022 for male-vertebral, $1044 for female-vertebral, $1035 for male-NHNV, and $1408 for female NHNV. Three comorbidities were associated with increasing fracture treatment costs whereas four comorbidities were associated with decreasing fracture treatment costs. Five comorbidities were associated with increasing total medical costs whereas one comorbidity was associated with decreasing total medical costs.

conclusionsYearly treatment costs were increased considerably after fracture. Several comorbidities were considered to be cost drivers for osteoporotic fracture treatment. The cost estimates with different patient profile would support conducting health economic analysis in the future.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesRetrospective StudiesComorbidityCostDatabaseFractureJapanOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29696390
PMCPMC5918517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.