Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696354›Full record

Observational studyDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2018

[Compression bandages with and without padding : Observational controlled survey of pressure and comfort].

K Protz, S Reich-Schupke, K Müller, M Augustin, K Hagenström

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. [Innovations in medical compression therapy].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K ProtzCompetenzzentrum Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie (CVderm), Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, Bethanien - Höfe Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. kerstin.protz@gmx.de.
S Reich-SchupkeKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Venenzentrum der Dermatologischen und Gefäßchirurgischen Kliniken, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.
K MüllerCompetenzzentrum Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie (CVderm), Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, Bethanien - Höfe Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
M AugustinCompetenzzentrum Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie (CVderm), Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, Bethanien - Höfe Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
K HagenströmCompetenzzentrum Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie (CVderm), Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, Bethanien - Höfe Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of compression therapy, padded bandages are designed to prevent skin damage, increase adherence and support the success of therapy. Routine use is discussed, because comparative studies are lacking.

objectivesThis study examines effectiveness, comfort, and impact of short-stretch bandages without padding compared to underpadded bandages. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsIn all, 61 healthy participants wore padded bandages foam or synthetic cotton wool on one leg and nonpadded bandages on the other. On both sides, a resting pressure of 50 mm Hg was generated. After 60 min resting pressure, skin condition, comfort, pain, and fitting of the bandages were assessed.

resultsAll bandages showed pressure losses after 1 h; 82.0% of nonpadded bandages had a pressure drop of 9 mm Hg or more. The following were observed in unpadded bandages: constrictions (100.0%), severe redness (77.0%) and bruises (42.6%). Comfort was rated as pleasant by 3.3% without padding, by 83.9% with foam padding, and by 73.3% with synthetic cotton wool padding. Nonpadded compression bandages caused in 62.3% pain from 1-3 (numerical rating scale 0-10).

conclusionsPadded compression bandages maintain the therapy-relevant pressure better, provide more comfort, and cause less pain and skin problems than nonpadded compression bandages. These aspects are crucial for adherence, and therapeutic success. After 1 h of use on the healthy leg, there were obvious differences. Significantly more side effects may appear after several hours of use on previously damaged skin. Therefore, compression bandages should always be padded.

Indexed as

Compression BandagesPainHumansPressureSkinSurveys and QuestionnairesCompression bandagingCompression therapyPadded compression bandagesPadding materialsShort-stretch bandages

Identifiers

PMID29696354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.