ArticleExperimental brain research2018
The effects of audiovisual distraction on the muscle sympathetic responses to experimental muscle pain.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pain elicited by intramuscular infusion of hypertonic saline solution causes muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) to increase in some subjects, yet decrease in others. Although the direction of the response is not predictable based on baseline physiological and psychological parameters, we know that it results from sustained functional changes in specific brain regions that are responsible for the behavioral and cardiovascular responses to psychological stressors, as well as those involved in attention. The aim of this study was to investigate whether MSNA responses to experimental muscle pain in humans could be altered with an audiovisual stimulus that served to distract them from the pain. MSNA was recorded from the left common peroneal nerve of 20 young healthy individuals during a 45-min intramuscular infusion of hypertonic saline solution into the ipsilateral tibialis anterior muscle. The distracting stimulus commenced 15 min after the start of the infusion and lasted for 15 min. Fifteen subjects showed an increase in mean burst amplitude of MSNA (to 176.4 ± 7.9% of baseline), while five showed a decrease (to 73.1 ± 5.2% of baseline); distraction had no effect on these profiles. These results indicate that even though the subjects were attending to the audiovisual stimulus, and were presumably distracted from the pain, it failed to alter the MSNA responses to muscle pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.