Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696215›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2017

Perceptions and attitudes to clinical research participation in Qatar.

Hiba Tohid, Sopna M Choudhury, Sahar Agouba, Abdi Aden, Lina H M Ahmed, Omar Omar, Odette Chagoury, Shahrad Taheri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Knowledge, attitude, and perception of public about participation in COVID-19 clinical trials: a study from Egypt and Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiba TohidDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Sopna M ChoudhuryDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Sahar AgoubaDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Abdi AdenDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Lina H M AhmedDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Omar OmarDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Odette ChagouryDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Shahrad TaheriDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Core, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Qatar Foundation-Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QACornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recruitment into clinical research studies is a major challenge. This study was carried out to explore the perceptions and attitudes towards clinical research participation among the general public in Qatar. A population based questionnaire study was carried out at public events held in Qatar. Residents of Qatar, 18 years or above in age were surveyed, anonymously, following verbal consent. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were conducted. We administered 2517 questionnaires to examine clinical research participation, of which 2379 complete forms were analyzed. Those who had previously been approached to participate in research completed a more detailed assessment. Data showed that only 5.7% participants (n = 134) had previously been approached to participate in a clinical research study. Of these 63.4% (n = 85) had agreed to participate while 36.6% (n = 49) had declined. The main reasons for declining participation included: time constraint (47.8%, n = 11), 'fear' (13.0%, n = 3), lack of awareness about clinical research (8.7%, n = 2) and lack of interest (8.7%, n = 2). 'To help others' (31.8%, n = 27) and 'thought it might improve my access to health care' (24.7%, n = 21) were the prime motivators for participation. There was a general agreement among participants that their previous research experience was associated with positive outcomes for self and others, that the research conduct was ethical, and that opportunities for participation will be welcomed in future. More than ten years of stay within Qatar was a statistically significant determinant of willingness to participate, adjusted odds ratio 5.82 (95% CI 1.93-17.55), p = 0.002. Clinical research participation in Qatar needs improvement. Time constraints, lack of trust in and poor awareness about clinical research are main barriers to participation. Altruism, and improved health access are reported as prime motivators. Deeper insight in to the factors affecting clinical research participation is needed to devise evidence based policies for improvement in recruitment strategies.

Indexed as

AttitudesBarriersClinical researchMotivatorsPerceptionsQatar

Identifiers

PMID29696215
PMCPMC5898555
OpenAlexW2766820013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.