Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696150›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

A Dynamic Connectome Supports the Emergence of Stable Computational Function of Neural Circuits through Reward-Based Learning.

David Kappel, Robert Legenstein, Stefan Habenschuss, Michael Hsieh, Wolfgang Maass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stability through plasticity: Finding robust memories through representational drift.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Representational drift in barrel cortex is receptive field dependent.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Unraveling the mysteries of dendritic spine dynamics: Five key principles shaping memory and cognition.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Self-healing codes: How stable neural populations can track continually reconfiguring neural representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Drifting assemblies for persistent memory: Neuron transitions and unsupervised compensation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Adaptive Tuning Curve Widths Improve Sample Efficient Learning.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Causes and consequences of representational drift.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David KappelInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Robert LegensteinInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8724-5507
Stefan HabenschussInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Michael HsiehInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Wolfgang MaassInstitute for Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-087X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic connections between neurons in the brain are dynamic because of continuously ongoing spine dynamics, axonal sprouting, and other processes. In fact, it was recently shown that the spontaneous synapse-autonomous component of spine dynamics is at least as large as the component that depends on the history of pre- and postsynaptic neural activity. These data are inconsistent with common models for network plasticity and raise the following questions: how can neural circuits maintain a stable computational function in spite of these continuously ongoing processes, and what could be functional uses of these ongoing processes? Here, we present a rigorous theoretical framework for these seemingly stochastic spine dynamics and rewiring processes in the context of reward-based learning tasks. We show that spontaneous synapse-autonomous processes, in combination with reward signals such as dopamine, can explain the capability of networks of neurons in the brain to configure themselves for specific computational tasks, and to compensate automatically for later changes in the network or task. Furthermore, we show theoretically and through computer simulations that stable computational performance is compatible with continuously ongoing synapse-autonomous changes. After reaching good computational performance it causes primarily a slow drift of network architecture and dynamics in task-irrelevant dimensions, as observed for neural activity in motor cortex and other areas. On the more abstract level of reinforcement learning the resulting model gives rise to an understanding of reward-driven network plasticity as continuous sampling of network configurations.

Indexed as

ConnectomeModels, TheoreticalNeural Networks, ComputerRewardAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansNerve NetNeuronal PlasticitySynapsesreward-modulated STDPspine dynamicsstochastic synaptic plasticitysynapse-autonomous processessynaptic rewiringtask-irrelevant dimensions in motor control

Identifiers

PMID29696150
PMCPMC5913731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.