Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2018

Using Acellular Bioactive Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds to Enhance Endogenous Cardiac Repair.

Daniyil A Svystonyuk, Holly E M Mewhort, Paul W M Fedak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Biological Scaffolds for Congenital Heart Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Genome Editing and Cardiac Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Engineered biomaterials for heart disease.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  12. Promoting Cardiac Regeneration and Repair Using Acellular Biomaterials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniyil A SvystonyukSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Holly E M MewhortSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Paul W M FedakSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An inability to recover lost cardiac muscle following acute ischemic injury remains the biggest shortcoming of current therapies to prevent heart failure. As compared to standard medical and surgical treatments, tissue engineering strategies offer the promise of improved heart function by inducing regeneration of functional heart muscle. Tissue engineering approaches that use stem cells and genetic manipulation have shown promise in preclinical studies but have also been challenged by numerous critical barriers preventing effective clinical translational. We believe that surgical intervention using acellular bioactive ECM scaffolds may yield similar therapeutic benefits with minimal translational hurdles. In this review, we outline the limitations of cellular-based tissue engineering strategies and the advantages of using acellular biomaterials with bioinductive properties. We highlight key anatomic targets enriched with cellular niches that can be uniquely activated using bioactive scaffold therapy. Finally, we review the evolving cardiovascular tissue engineering landscape and provide critical insights into the potential therapeutic benefits of acellular scaffold therapy.

Indexed as

biomaterials sciencecardiovascular diseasescardiovascular surgeryextracellular matrixregeneration mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID29696148
PMCPMC5904207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.