Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29696139›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2018

A Machine Learning Application Based in Random Forest for Integrating Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomic Data: A Simple Screening Method for Patients With Zika Virus.

Carlos Fernando Odir Rodrigues Melo, Luiz Claudio Navarro, Diogo Noin de Oliveira, Tatiane Melina Guerreiro, Estela de Oliveira Lima, Jeany Delafiori, Mohamed Ziad Dabaja, Marta da Silva Ribeiro, Maico de Menezes, Rafael Gustavo Martins Rodrigues and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Metabolomics: A Current Review.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  5. Precision Medicine Approaches with Metabolomics and Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Combining Machine Learning and Metabolomics to Identify Weight Gain Biomarkers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Carlos Fernando Odir Rodrigues MeloInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Luiz Claudio NavarroRECOD Laboratory, Institute of Computing (IC), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Diogo Noin de OliveiraInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Tatiane Melina GuerreiroInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Estela de Oliveira LimaInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Jeany DelafioriInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Mohamed Ziad DabajaInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Marta da Silva RibeiroInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Maico de MenezesInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Rafael Gustavo Martins RodriguesInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Karen Noda MorishitaInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Cibele Zanardi EstevesInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Aline Lopes Lucas de AmorimInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Caroline Tiemi AoyaguiInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Pierina Lorencini PariseDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Guilherme Paier MilanezDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Gabriela Mansano do NascimentoDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
André Ricardo Ribas FreitasCampinas Department of Public Health Surveillance, Campinas, Brazil.
Rodrigo AngeramiClinical Pathology Department, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Fábio Trindade Maranhão CostaDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Clarice Weis ArnsDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Mariangela Ribeiro ResendeClinical Pathology Department, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Eliana AmaralObstetrics and Gynecology Department, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Renato Passini JuniorObstetrics and Gynecology Department, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Carolina C Ribeiro-do-ValleObstetrics and Gynecology Department, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Helaine MilanezObstetrics and Gynecology Department, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Maria Luiza MorettiClinical Pathology Department, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Jose Luiz Proenca-ModenaDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Biology Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Sandra AvilaRECOD Laboratory, Institute of Computing (IC), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Anderson RochaRECOD Laboratory, Institute of Computing (IC), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Rodrigo Ramos CatharinoInnovare Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCF), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent Zika outbreaks in South America, accompanied by unexpectedly severe clinical complications have brought much interest in fast and reliable screening methods for ZIKV (Zika virus) identification. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is currently the method of choice to detect ZIKV in biological samples. This approach, nonetheless, demands a considerable amount of time and resources such as kits and reagents that, in endemic areas, may result in a substantial financial burden over affected individuals and health services veering away from RT-PCR analysis. This study presents a powerful combination of high-resolution mass spectrometry and a machine-learning prediction model for data analysis to assess the existence of ZIKV infection across a series of patients that bear similar symptomatic conditions, but not necessarily are infected with the disease. By using mass spectrometric data that are inputted with the developed decision-making algorithm, we were able to provide a set of features that work as a "fingerprint" for this specific pathophysiological condition, even after the acute phase of infection. Since both mass spectrometry and machine learning approaches are well-established and have largely utilized tools within their respective fields, this combination of methods emerges as a distinct alternative for clinical applications, providing a diagnostic screening-faster and more accurate-with improved cost-effectiveness when compared to existing technologies.

Indexed as

diagnosis classifierdiseases diagnosisfeature importancehigh resolution mass spectrometrymachine learningrandom forestZika diagnosisZika virus

Identifiers

PMID29696139
PMCPMC5904215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.