ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2017
Acute Cervical and Thoracic Ventral Side Spontaneous Spinal Epidural Hematoma Causing High Paraplegia: A Case Report.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic factors and surgical outcomes of spontaneous spinal epidural haematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma following IV heparin and catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024Article
- Spontaneous cervical epidural hematoma: Insight into this occurrence with case examples.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Spontaneous Epidural Hematoma of the Cervical Spine Following Thrombolysis in a Patient with STEMI-Two Medical Specialties Facing a Rare Dilemma.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpontaneous spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) is a rare condition that can potentially cause paraplegia. SSEH has an increasing incidence rate and its cause remains unclear. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results shows that SSEH presents a spinal epidural space-occupying lesion; therefore, emergency surgical treatment is required in some cases. MRI results of most SSEH cases showed that hematoma occurs in the dorsal or lateral side. By contrast, hematoma in the ventral side is very rarely shown. CASE PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old healthy woman developed a sudden onset of severe neck pain with mild limb weakness, gradual breathing difficulty, and high paraplegia. MRI results revealed that an SSEH was compressing her spinal cord in the ventral epidural space from C2 to T3. Upon admission, she received emergency decompressive laminectomy in a posterior approach from C3 to T1, and the epidural hematoma was evacuated through full incision of the dorsal side dural, release of cerebrospinal fluid, and intermittent incision of the ventral side dural. The symptoms of limb paralysis and breathing distress gradually improved after recover rehabilitation, and the patient was discharged with life self-care after 2 months.
conclusionsPerforming early decompressive laminectomy and evacuation of hematoma on severe SSEH patients improves neurological outcomes. For patients with ventral side SSEH, the cerebrospinal fluid should be released after the incision on the dorsal side dural, and the ventral side dural should be gradually as well as intermittently clipped to evacuate the hematoma. The patient would also receive a good prognosis after the total release of the spinal cord compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.