Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695767›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2018

Cutaneous neurofibromas in the genomics era: current understanding and open questions.

Robert J Allaway, Sara J C Gosline, Salvatore La Rosa, Pamela Knight, Annette Bakker, Justin Guinney, Lu Q Le

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A rare case report of solitary neurofibroma arising in the male breast.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improving the lives of children with neurofibromatosis type 1.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J AllawaySage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Sara J C GoslineSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Salvatore La RosaChildren's Tumor Foundation, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
Pamela KnightChildren's Tumor Foundation, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
Annette BakkerChildren's Tumor Foundation, New York, NY, 10005, USA.
Justin GuinneySage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Lu Q LeDepartment of Dermatology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Neurofibromatosis Clinic, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. lu.le@utsouthwestern.edu.
Children's Tumor Foundation · USSage Bionetworks · USSouthwestern Medical Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) are a nearly ubiquitous symptom of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a disorder with a broad phenotypic spectrum caused by germline mutation of the neurofibromatosis type 1 tumour suppressor gene (NF1). Symptoms of NF1 can include learning disabilities, bone abnormalities and predisposition to tumours such as cNFs, plexiform neurofibromas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours and optic nerve tumours. There are no therapies currently approved for cNFs aside from elective surgery, and the molecular aetiology of cNF remains relatively uncharacterised. Furthermore, whereas the biallelic inactivation of NF1 in neoplastic Schwann cells is critical for cNF formation, it is still unclear which additional genetic, transcriptional, epigenetic, microenvironmental or endocrine changes are important. Significant inroads have been made into cNF understanding, including NF1 genotype-phenotype correlations in NF1 microdeletion patients, the identification of recurring somatic mutations, studies of cNF-invading mast cells and macrophages, and clinical trials of putative therapeutic targets such as mTOR, MEK and c-KIT. Despite these advances, several gaps remain in our knowledge of the associated pathogenesis, which is further hampered by a lack of translationally relevant animal models. Some of these questions may be addressed in part by the adoption of genomic analysis techniques. Understanding the aetiology of cNF at the genomic level may assist in the development of new therapies for cNF, and may also contribute to a greater understanding of NF1/RAS signalling in cancers beyond those associated with NF1. Here, we summarise the present understanding of cNF biology, including the pathogenesis, mutational landscape, contribution of the tumour microenvironment and endocrine signalling, and the historical and current state of clinical trials for cNF. We also highlight open access data resources and potential avenues for future research that leverage recently developed genomics-based methods in cancer research.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenes, Neurofibromatosis 1GenomicsHumansMutationNeurofibromatosesNeurofibromatosis 1Neurofibromin 1Skin NeoplasmsNeurofibromin 1NF1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29695767
PMCPMC6008439
OpenAlexW2802139137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.