Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695764›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Integrative network analyses of wilt transcriptome in chickpea reveal genotype dependent regulatory hubs in immunity and susceptibility.

Nasheeman Ashraf, Swaraj Basu, Kanika Narula, Sudip Ghosh, Rajul Tayal, Nagaraju Gangisetty, Sushmita Biswas, Pooja R Aggarwal, Niranjan Chakraborty, Subhra Chakraborty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Genomics of Plant Disease Resistance in Legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nasheeman AshrafNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Swaraj BasuNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Kanika NarulaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Sudip GhoshNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Rajul TayalNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Nagaraju GangisettyNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Sushmita BiswasNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Pooja R AggarwalNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Niranjan ChakrabortyNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Subhra ChakrabortyNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India. subhrac@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host specific resistance and non-host resistance are two plant immune responses to counter pathogen invasion. Gene network organizing principles leading to quantitative differences in resistant and susceptible host during host specific resistance are poorly understood. Vascular wilt caused by root pathogen Fusarium species is complex and governed by host specific resistance in crop plants, including chickpea. Here, we temporally profiled two contrasting chickpea genotypes in disease and immune state to better understand gene expression switches in host specific resistance. Integrative gene-regulatory network elucidated tangible insight into interaction coordinators leading to pathway determination governing distinct (disease or immune) phenotypes. Global network analysis identified five major hubs with 389 co-regulated genes. Functional enrichment revealed immunome containing three subnetworks involving CTI, PTI and ETI and wilt diseasome encompassing four subnetworks highlighting pathogen perception, penetration, colonization and disease establishment. These subnetworks likely represent key components that coordinate various biological processes favouring defence or disease. Furthermore, we identified core 76 disease/immunity related genes through subcellular analysis. Our regularized network with robust statistical assessment captured known and unexpected gene interaction, candidate novel regulators as future biomarkers and first time showed system-wide quantitative architecture corresponding to genotypic characteristics in wilt landscape.

Indexed as

CicerFusariumGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, PlantGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsPhenotypePlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityPlant RootsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29695764
PMCPMC5916944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.