Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695749›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2018

Oncolytic viruses as engineering platforms for combination immunotherapy.

Kwame Twumasi-Boateng, Jessica L Pettigrew, Y Y Eunice Kwok, John C Bell, Brad H Nelson

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06080984 (The Application of Novel Oncolytic Virus in Late Stage Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 255 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
255citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06080984 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Application of Novel Oncolytic Virus in Late Stage Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsMalignant TumorArmsOncolytic Virus SDJ001, Oncolytic Virus YD06-1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

255 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tuning epigenetics to enhance cancer virotherapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Intravenous infusion of engineered megakaryocytes to produce oncolytic platelets in vivo for enhanced cancer immunotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

195 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kwame Twumasi-BoatengTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Jessica L PettigrewDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Y Y Eunice KwokTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
John C BellCenter for Innovative Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. jbell@ohri.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-357X
Brad H NelsonTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. bnelson@bccrc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To effectively build on the recent successes of immune checkpoint blockade, adoptive T cell therapy and cancer vaccines, it is critical to rationally design combination strategies that will increase and extend efficacy to a larger proportion of patients. For example, the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) immune checkpoint inhibitors essentially doubles the response rate in certain patients with metastatic melanoma. However, given the heterogeneity of cancer, it seems likely that even more complex combinations of immunomodulatory agents may be required to obtain consistent, durable therapeutic responses against a broad spectrum of cancers. This carries serious implications in terms of toxicities for patients, feasibility for care providers and costs for health-care systems. A compelling solution is offered by oncolytic viruses (OVs), which can be engineered to selectively replicate within and destroy tumour tissue while simultaneously augmenting antitumour immunity. In this Opinion article, we argue that the future of immunotherapy will include OVs that function as multiplexed immune-modulating platforms expressing factors such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumour antigens, cytokines and T cell engagers. We illustrate this concept by following the trials and tribulations of tumour-reactive T cells from their initial priming through to the execution of cytotoxic effector function in the tumour bed. We highlight the myriad opportunities for OVs to help overcome critical barriers in the T cell journey, leading to new synergistic mechanisms in the battle against cancer.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferCancer VaccinesCombined Modality TherapyCTLA-4 AntigenHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicCancer VaccinesCTLA-4 AntigenProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.