ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018
Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Engineering a biomimetic multiphasic suture anchor system for enhanced rotator cuff enthesis regeneration.Science advances · 2026Article
- Engineering a Biomimetic Multiphasic Suture Anchor System for Enhanced Rotator Cuff Enthesis Regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Collagen scaffold-seeded iTenocytes accelerate the healing and functional recovery of Achilles tendon defects in a rat model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Cerium Oxide and Chondroitin Sulfate Doped Polyurethane Scaffold to Bridge Tendons.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- An overview of the material science and knowledge of nanomedicine, bioscaffolds, and tissue engineering for tendon restoration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2021Article
- Tendon Tissue Repair in Prospective of Drug Delivery, Regenerative Medicines, and Innovative Bioscaffolds.Stem cells international · 2021Review
- The Role of Scaffolds in Tendon Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2020Review
- Opportunities of Bacterial Cellulose to Treat Epithelial Tissues.Current drug targets · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As our ability to engineer nanoscale materials has developed we can now influence endogenous cellular processes with increasing precision. Consequently, the use of biomaterials to induce and guide the repair and regeneration of tissues is a rapidly developing area. This review focuses on soft tissue engineering, it will discuss the types of biomaterial scaffolds available before exploring physical, chemical and biological modifications to synthetic scaffolds. We will consider how these properties, in combination, can provide a precise design process, with the potential to meet the requirements of the injured and diseased soft tissue niche. Finally, we frame our discussions within clinical trial design and the regulatory framework, the consideration of which is fundamental to the successful translation of new biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.