Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695566›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

A Pathological Study Using 2014 WHO Criteria Reveals Poor Prognosis of Grade 3 Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinomas.

Hiroaki Soyama, Morikazu Miyamoto, Masashi Takano, Hideki Iwahashi, Kento Kato, Takahiro Sakamoto, Mika Kuwahara, Hiroki Ishibashi, Hiroko Matuura, Tomoyuki Yoshikawa and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Investigating the suitability ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroaki SoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Morikazu MiyamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan morikazu1118@hotmail.co.jp.
Masashi TakanoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Hideki IwahashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Kento KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Takahiro SakamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Mika KuwaharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Hiroki IshibashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Hiroko MatuuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Tomoyuki YoshikawaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Tadashi AoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Hitoshi TsudaDepartment of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Kenichi FuruyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
National Defense Medical College Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe purpose of this study was to compare the clinical behavior of several grades of endometrioid carcinoma (EC) compared to high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), based on World Health Organization 2014 criteria. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinicopathological features were compared between all grades of EC and HGSC, and between HGSC and either grade 1/2 or grade 3 EC.

resultsSixty-five patients with EC and 214 with HGSC were identified. Among patients with EC, 56 displayed 1/2 EC and nine had grade 3 EC. The progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival of patients with grade 1/2 EC were better than of those of patients with HGSC; however, PFS and OS did not statistically differ between patients with grade 3 EC and those with HGSC. Grade 1/2 EC, but not grade 3, was a better prognostic factor compared with HGSC.

conclusionA grading system for EC would be beneficial for the accurate prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsWorld Health OrganizationBiomarkers, TumorOvarian endometrioid carcinomaovarian high-grade serous carcinomaprognosisWorld Health Organization 2014 criteria

Identifiers

PMID29695566
PMCPMC6000796
OpenAlexW2983081779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.