Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695549›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Toshiki Wada, Ryota Maruyama, Yuta Irie, Masashi Hashimoto, Hidetsugu Wakabayashi, Noriyuki Okudaira, Yoshihiro Uesawa, Hajime Kagaya, Hiroshi Sakagami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Toshiki WadaFaculty of Science, Josai University, Saitama, Japan.
Ryota MaruyamaFaculty of Science, Josai University, Saitama, Japan.
Yuta IrieFaculty of Science, Josai University, Saitama, Japan.
Masashi HashimotoFaculty of Science, Josai University, Saitama, Japan.
Hidetsugu WakabayashiFaculty of Science, Josai University, Saitama, Japan hwaka@josai.ac.jp sakagami@dent.meikai.ac.jp.
Noriyuki OkudairaDivision of Pharmacology, Meikai University School of Dentistry, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshihiro UesawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hajime KagayaDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi SakagamiMeikai University Research Institute of Odontology (M-RIO), Saitama, Japan hwaka@josai.ac.jp sakagami@dent.meikai.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThere exist few research articles regarding the anticancer activity of azulene-related compounds. We investigated here the relative cytotoxicity of 10 azulene amide derivatives against cancer and normal cells. MATERIALS AND

methodsCytotoxicity against four human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines and three human oral normal cells (gingival fibroblasts, periodontal ligament fibroblasts and pulp cells) was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetra-zolium bromide method. Antitumor activity was evaluated by tumor-specificity (TS) (ratio of mean 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC

resultsN-Propylguaiazulenecarboxamide [

conclusionCompound [

Indexed as

AzulenesAmidesAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDoxorubicinFibroblastsHumansMolecular StructureAmidesAntineoplastic AgentsAzulenesDoxorubicinapoptosisAzulene amidescytotoxicityhydrophobicitymolecular shapetumor specificity

Identifiers

PMID29695549
PMCPMC6000805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.