Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695501›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

Design of a heme-binding peptide motif adopting a β-hairpin conformation.

Deepesh Nagarajan, Sujeesh Sukumaran, Geeta Deka, Kiran Krishnamurthy, Hanudatta S Atreya, Nagasuma Chandra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deepesh NagarajanFrom the Department of Biochemistry.
Sujeesh SukumaranNMR Research Centre.
Geeta DekaMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Kiran KrishnamurthyNMR Research Centre.
Hanudatta S AtreyaNMR Research Centre.
Nagasuma ChandraFrom the Department of Biochemistry, nchandra@iisc.ac.in sumachandra@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9939-8439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heme-binding proteins constitute a large family of catalytic and transport proteins. Their widespread presence as globins and as essential oxygen and electron transporters, along with their diverse enzymatic functions, have made them targets for protein design. Most previously reported designs involved the use of α-helical scaffolds, and natural peptides also exhibit a strong preference for these scaffolds. However, the reason for this preference is not well-understood, in part because alternative protein designs, such as those with β-sheets or hairpins, are challenging to perform. Here, we report the computational design and experimental validation of a water-soluble heme-binding peptide, Pincer-1, composed of predominantly β-scaffold secondary structures. Such heme-binding proteins are rarely observed in nature, and by designing such a scaffold, we simultaneously increase the known fold space of heme-binding proteins and expand the limits of computational design methods. For a β-scaffold, two tryptophan zipper β-hairpins sandwiching a heme molecule were linked through an N-terminal cysteine disulfide bond. β-Hairpin orientations and residue selection were performed computationally. Heme binding was confirmed through absorbance experiments and surface plasmon resonance experiments (

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCircular DichroismHemeModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPeptidesProtein Conformation, beta-StrandProtein FoldingHemePeptidescomputational biologyhemeprotein designprotein foldingprotein motifstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID29695501
PMCPMC6005436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.