Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695489›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2018

Dynamics of sister chromatid resolution during cell cycle progression.

Rugile Stanyte, Johannes Nuebler, Claudia Blaukopf, Rudolf Hoefler, Roman Stocsits, Jan-Michael Peters, Daniel W Gerlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural basis of centromeric cohesion protection.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Impact of Space and Time on the Functional Output of the Genome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Mitotic chromosomes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rugile StanyteInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes NueblerInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-1604
Claudia BlaukopfInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf HoeflerInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
Roman StocsitsResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
Jan-Michael PetersResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-3195
Daniel W GerlichInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria daniel.gerlich@imba.oeaw.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-1637-3365
Institute of Molecular Biotechnology · ATResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · ATMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Polymer models of mitotic and interphase chromosomesR01GM114190 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MIRNY, LEONID A · 2015 to 2023
$2.8M
Austrian Science Fund FWF F 3412European Research Council 281198NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faithful genome transmission in dividing cells requires that the two copies of each chromosome's DNA package into separate but physically linked sister chromatids. The linkage between sister chromatids is mediated by cohesin, yet where sister chromatids are linked and how they resolve during cell cycle progression has remained unclear. In this study, we investigated sister chromatid organization in live human cells using dCas9-mEGFP labeling of endogenous genomic loci. We detected substantial sister locus separation during G2 phase irrespective of the proximity to cohesin enrichment sites. Almost all sister loci separated within a few hours after their respective replication and then rapidly equilibrated their average distances within dynamic chromatin polymers. Our findings explain why the topology of sister chromatid resolution in G2 largely reflects the DNA replication program. Furthermore, these data suggest that cohesin enrichment sites are not persistent cohesive sites in human cells. Rather, cohesion might occur at variable genomic positions within the cell population.

Indexed as

Cell CycleAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineCell SurvivalChromatidsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNA Replication TimingFluorescent DyesGenetic LociGenome, HumanHumansInterphaseModels, BiologicalAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCDCA5 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID29695489
PMCPMC5987726
OpenAlexW2952639142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.