Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695458›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2019

Transitions in electronic cigarette use among adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves 1 and 2 (2013-2015).

Blair Coleman, Brian Rostron, Sarah E Johnson, Alexander Persoskie, Jennifer Pearson, Cassandra Stanton, Kelvin Choi, Gabriella Anic, Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz, Kenneth Michael Cummings and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patterns of e-Cigarette Use and Smoking Cessation Outcomes: Secondary Analysis of a Large Randomised Controlled Trial to Inform Clinical Advice.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The Impact of E-liquid Propylene Glycol and Vegetable Glycerin Ratio on Ratings of Subjective Effects, Reinforcement Value, and Use in Current Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nicotine and Toxicant Exposure among Individuals using both Combustible Cigarettes and E-cigarettes Based on Level of Product Use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Blair ColemanOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Brian RostronOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Sarah E JohnsonOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Alexander PersoskieOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer PearsonSchool of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1400-5932
Cassandra StantonWestat Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Kelvin ChoiDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6753-2883
Gabriella AnicOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Maciej Lukasz GoniewiczDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Kenneth Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA.
Karin A KaszaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Marushka L SilveiraDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4880-2550
Cristine DelnevoCenter for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Raymond Niaura
David B AbramsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU College of Global Public Health, New York, USA.
Heather L KimmelDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nicolette BorekOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Wilson M ComptonDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Andrew HylandDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Funding

Understanding and reducing tobacco-related health disparities through social and behavioral researchZIAMD000006 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI CHOI, KELVIN · 2015 to 2025
$7.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MD999999NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100027C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study assessed patterns of e-cigarette and cigarette use from Wave 1 to Wave 2 among adult e-cigarette users at Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

methodsWe examined changes in e-cigarette use frequency at Wave 2 among adult e-cigarette users at Wave 1 (unweighted n=2835). Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were calculated using a predicted marginal probability approach to assess correlates of e-cigarette discontinuance and smoking abstinence at Wave 2.

resultsHalf (48.8%) of adult e-cigarette users at Wave 1 discontinued their use of e-cigarettes at Wave 2. Among dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes at Wave 1, 44.3% maintained dual use, 43.5% discontinued e-cigarette use and maintained cigarette smoking and 12.1% discontinued cigarette use at Wave 2, either by abstaining from cigarette smoking only (5.1%) or discontinuing both products (7.0%). Among dual users at Wave 1, daily e-cigarette users were more likely than non-daily users to report smoking abstinence at Wave 2 (aPR=1.40, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.91). Using a customisable device (rather than a non-customisable one) was not significantly related to smoking abstinence at Wave 2 (aPR=1.14, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.60).

conclusionsThis study suggests that e-cigarette use patterns are highly variable over a 1-year period. This analysis provides the first nationally representative estimates of transitions among US adult e-cigarette users. Future research, including additional waves of the PATH Study, can provide further insight into long-term patterns of e-cigarette use critical to understanding the net population health impact of e-cigarettes in USA.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdolescentAdultCigarette SmokingCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesPrevalenceProbabilitySmoking CessationTime FactorsUnited StatesVapingYoung Adultelectronic nicotine delivery devicesnon-cigarette tobacco productssurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID29695458
PMCPMC6202279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.