ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018
Relevance of Trust Marks and CE Labels in German-Language Store Descriptions of Health Apps: Analysis.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritization of Quality Principles for Health Apps Using the Kano Model: Survey Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Trial
- Evaluation of a semiautomated App Store analysis for the identification of health apps for cardiac arrhythmias.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2023Article
- [Support of opioid rotation using online apps : Evaluation of applicability and comparison to the LONTS guidelines].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- [Secure app usage-Evaluation benchmarks for medical apps : Quality aspects for health apps based on 9 key criteria].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Proposal of a New Rating Concept for Digital Health Applications in Orthopedics and Traumatology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- [Mobile health for detection of atrial fibrillation-Status quo and perspectives].Der Internist · 2022Review
- [Great potential, little substance : Overview of quality and quantity of urological apps in the German app store].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2022Review
- [Identification of rheumatological health apps in the Apple app store applying the "semiautomatic retrospective app store analysis" method : A longitudinal observation].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Article
- Article
- [Mobile apps and their usage in rheumatology].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2020Article
- Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack".JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Review
- [Unintended consequences and side effects of digital health technology: a public health perspective].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020Review
- Quality Awareness and Its Influence on the Evaluation of App Meta-Information by Physicians: Validation Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users.JMIR formative research · 2019Article
- German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- A Scientific Overview of Smartphone Applications and Electronic Devices for Weight Management in Adults.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Article
- Quality Principles of App Description Texts and Their Significance in Deciding to Use Health Apps as Assessed by Medical Students: Survey Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Description of Cardiological Apps From the German App Store: Semiautomated Retrospective App Store Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- Smart health via mHealth? Potentials of mobile health apps for improving prevention and adherence of breast cancer patients.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn addition to mandatory CE marking ("CE" representing Conformité Européenne, with the CE marking being a symbol of free marketability in the European Economic Area) for medical devices, there are various seals, initiatives, action groups, etc, in the health app context. However, whether manufacturers use them to distinguish their apps and attach relevance to them is unclear.
objectiveThe objective was to take a snapshot of quality seals, regulatory marks, and other orientation aids available on the German app market and to determine whether manufacturers deem such labels relevant enough to apply them to their apps, namely as reflected by mentions in app description texts in a typical app store (ie, Apple's App Store).
methodsA full survey of the metadata of 103,046 apps from Apple's German App Store in the Medicine and Health & Fitness categories was carried out. For apps with German-language store descriptions (N=8767), these were automatically searched for the occurrence of relevant keywords and validated manually (N=41). In addition, the websites of various app seal providers were checked for assigned seals.
resultsFew manufacturers referenced seals in the descriptions (5/41), although this would have been expected more often based on the seals we were able to identify from the seal providers' Web pages, and there were 34 of 41 that mentioned CE status in the descriptions. Two apps referenced an app directory curated by experts; however, this is not an alternative to CE marks and seals of approval.
conclusionsCurrently, quality seals seem to be irrelevant for manufacturers. In line with regulatory requirements, mentions of medical device status are more frequent; however, neither characteristic is effective for identifying high-quality apps. To improve this situation, a possibly legally obligatory, standardized reporting system should be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.