ArticleGlobalization and health2018
Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries.
Article in Globalization and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A Cost-Effective Liquid Chromatography Method with Ultraviolet Detection for Identity Screening and Assay of Injectable Antibiotics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perception of falsified and counterfeit medicines among adults living in Mexico City and the metropolitan area: an underappreciated health risk.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating the Presence of Falsified and Poor-Quality Fixed-Dose Combination Artemether-Lumefantrine Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms in Kumasi, Ghana.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Detection of Substandard and Falsified Antibiotics Sold in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Using Validated HPLC and UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Methods.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Usefulness of medicine screening tools in the frame of pharmaceutical post-marketing surveillance.PloS one · 2023Article
- Comparing the return on investment of technologies to detect substandard and falsified amoxicillin: A Kenya case study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Surveillance for substandard and falsified medicines by local faith-based organizations in 13 low- and middle-income countries using the GPHF Minilab.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Multiphase evaluation of portable medicines quality screening devices.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Evaluation of portable devices for medicine quality screening: Lessons learnt, recommendations for implementation, and future priorities.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- A comparative field evaluation of six medicine quality screening devices in Laos.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Laboratory evaluation of twelve portable devices for medicine quality screening.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- How Do We Combat Bogus Medicines in the Age of the COVID-19 Pandemic?The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- What Makes a National Pharmaceutical Track and Trace System Succeed? Lessons From Turkey.Global health, science and practice · 2020Article
- Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method.Malaria journal · 2019Article
- Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems.Globalization and health · 2018Review
- Field detection devices for screening the quality of medicines: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2018Article
- Advancing health system strengthening through improving access to medicines: A review of local manufacturing policies in Ghana.Medicine access @ point of careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe spread of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products constitutes a growing global public health concern. Some countries use portable, handheld screening technologies (STs) in the field to accelerate detection of SF medicines and reduce the number of medicine samples that undergo costly and time-consuming confirmatory analysis.
methodsA multi-country, multi-stakeholder landscape assessment utilizing qualitative methodology was used to examine practices and perceptions related to the use of STs. Qualitative interview guides were designed using the results of a literature review and comprised of open-ended questions with the study participants, who were from national medicine regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacies, and distributors. Ten geographically and economically diverse countries were selected: Argentina, China, Egypt, India, Jordan, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, the United States, and Zimbabwe. Of the completed 53 interviews, 32 were in-person, 16 were phone interviews, and 5 were via written questionnaires.
resultsData analysis shows a wide variation in understanding and usage of STs in different sectors. Virtually all of the study participants indicated a lack of objective, accessible information on STs to advise them on what technologies would be beneficial for their needs. Study participants also described their ideal capabilities of the next generation of STs, including shareable spectral libraries, lower acquisition costs, lesser training requirements, and in-country maintenance and technical support.
conclusionThe results and recommendations presented in this article can be used to help regulators communicate and justify their needs to acquire and invest in new STs. There is a need for additional standardized, trustworthy and scientifically sound evaluations of STs, and to support regulators to effectively deploy the most promising technologies. ST manufacturers can take into account some of the limitations of the technologies the interviewees identified in this article, such as a dearth of technologies, which provide quantitative information about the active ingredient, and take steps to address them to better serve their customers. These results and recommendations, can catalyze research and actionable interventions into the development, review, application, and use of STs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.