ArticleParasites & vectors2018
DNA barcoding of morphologically characterized mosquitoes belonging to the subfamily Culicinae from Sri Lanka.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Central Nepal.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- DNA barcoding and blood meal profiling of Ethiopian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): insights into species identification and host preferences.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Real-time dynamic monitoring and multiplex PCR identification of vector mosquitoes in Zhejiang, China.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Molecular Identification of Species Belonging to Culex vishnui Subgroup (Diptera: Culicidae), Vectors of Japanese Encephalitis Virus, in Taiwan.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Barcoding of Italian mosquitoes (BITMO): generation and validation of DNA barcoding reference libraries for native and alien species of Culicidae.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Determination of Species Identity and Genetic Diversity of Aedes aegypti and Other Medically Important Mosquitoes of India Using DNA Barcoding.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Intraspecific sensilla dimorphism inHeliyon · 2024Article
- Island mosquitoes of Thailand: an update on species diversity and DNA barcoding.Parasitology research · 2024Article
- Comparison of a multiplex PCR with DNA barcoding for identification of container breeding mosquito species.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Malaria Vector Control: The Importance of Accurate Species Identification through Enhanced Molecular Capacity.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- DNA Barcodes ofGenes · 2023Article
- Article
- First Description of the Mitogenome Features ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Geometric morphometric and molecular techniques for discriminating among three cryptic species of theHeliyon · 2022Article
- Species Diversity, Habitat Distribution, and Blood Meal Analysis of Haematophagous Dipterans Collected by CDC-UV Light Traps in the Dominican Republic.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- DNA Barcoding of Potential Mosquito Disease Vectors (Diptera, Culicidae) in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- An inventory of human night-biting mosquitoes and their bionomics in Sumba, Indonesia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Article
- Redesigning Primer of ITS2 (Internal Transcribed Spacer 2) for Specific Molecular Characterization of Malaria Vectors Anopheles Species.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2021Article
- Aedes albopictus diversity and relationships in south-western Europe and Brazil by rDNA/mtDNA and phenotypic analyses: ITS-2, a useful marker for spread studies.Parasites & vectors · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVectors of mosquito-borne diseases in Sri Lanka, except for malaria, belong to the subfamily Culicinae, which includes nearly 84% of the mosquito fauna of the country. Hence, accurate and precise species identification of culicine mosquitoes is a crucial factor in implementing effective vector control strategies. During the present study, a combined effort using morphology and DNA barcoding was made to characterize mosquitoes of the subfamily Culicinae for the first time from nine districts of Sri Lanka. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene from the mitochondrial genome and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region from the nuclear ribosomal DNA were used for molecular characterization.
resultsAccording to morphological identification, the field collected adult mosquitoes belonged to 5 genera and 14 species, i.e. Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Ae. pallidostriatus, Aedes sp. 1, Armigeres sp. 1, Culex bitaeniorhynchus, Cx. fuscocephala, Cx. gelidus, Cx. pseudovishnui, Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, Cx. whitmorei, Mansonia uniformis and Mimomyia chamberlaini. Molecular analyses of 62 cox1 and 36 ITS2 sequences were exclusively comparable with the morphological identifications of all the species except for Ae. pallidostriatus and Aedes sp. 1. Although the species identification of Armigeres sp. 1 specimens using morphological features was not possible during this study, DNA barcodes of the specimens matched 100% with the publicly available Ar. subalbatus sequences, giving their species status. Analysis of all the cox1 sequences (14 clades supported by strong bootstrap value in the Neighbor-Joining tree and interspecific distances of > 3%) showed the presence of 14 different species. This is the first available DNA sequence in the GenBank records for morphologically identified Ae. pallidostriatus. Aedes sp. 1 could not be identified morphologically or by publicly available sequences. Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus and all Culex species reported during the current study are vectors of human diseases. All these vector species showed comparatively high diversity.
conclusionsThe current study reflects the significance of integrated systematic approach and use of cox1 and ITS genetic markers in mosquito taxonomy. Results of DNA barcoding were comparable with morphological identifications and, more importantly, DNA barcoding could accurately identify the species in the instances where the traditional morphological identification failed due to indistinguishable characters of damaged specimens and the presence of subspecies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.