ArticleBMC public health2018
Mass media and risk factors for cancer: the under-representation of age.
Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The relationship between fears of cancer recurrence and patient age: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020Pooled it
- Visualizing cancer and survivorship with generative AI?-an exploration of breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancer imagery.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- The impact of objective/sensationalist media on young women's concern and misconceptions about breast cancer: an experimental study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Exploring the Potential Link between Aluminum-Containing Deodorants/Antiperspirants and Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Socio-Economic Inequalities in Beliefs About Cancer and its Causes: Evidence From two Population Surveys.Psycho-oncology · 2024Article
- Cancer-related stigma in the USA and Israeli mass media: an exploratory study of structural stigma.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Article
- The integrated screening action model (I-SAM): A theory-based approach to inform intervention development.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Chilean Digital Press Coverage of the Relation between Diet and Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Change in public awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms following the Be Cancer Alert Campaign in the multi-ethnic population of Malaysia.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- The North American Layman's Understanding of COVID-19: Are We Doing Enough?Frontiers in public health · 2020Observational
- Characterizing Media Content and Effects of Organ Donation on a Social Media Platform: Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing age is a risk factor for developing cancer. Yet, older people commonly underestimate this risk, are less likely to be aware of the early symptoms, and are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage cancer. Mass media are a key influence on the public's understanding health issues, including cancer risk. This study investigates how news media have represented age and other risk factors in the most common cancers over time.
methodsEight hundred articles about the four most common cancers (breast, prostate, lung and colorectal) published within eight UK national newspapers in 2003, 2004, 2013 and 2014 were identified using the Nexis database. Relevant manifest content of articles was coded quantitatively and subjected to descriptive statistical analysis in SPSS to identify patterns across the data.
resultsRisk was presented in half of the articles but this was rarely discussed in any depth and around a quarter of all articles introduced more than one risk factor, irrespective of cancer site. Age was mentioned as a risk factor in approximately 12% of all articles and this varied by cancer site. Age was most frequently reported in relation to prostate cancer and least often in articles about lung cancer. Articles featuring personal narratives more frequently focused on younger people and this was more pronounced in non-celebrity stories; only 15% of non-celebrity narratives were about people over 60. Other common risks discussed were family history and genetics, smoking, diet, alcohol, and environmental factors. Family history and genetics together featured as the most common risk factors. Risk factor reporting varied by site and family history was most commonly associated with breast cancer, diet with bowel cancer and smoking with lung cancer.
conclusionAge and older adults were largely obscured in media representation of cancer and cancer experience. Indeed common risk factors in general were rarely discussed in any depth. Our findings will usefully inform the development of future cancer awareness campaigns and media guidelines. It is important that older adults appreciate their heightened risk, particularly in the context of help-seeking decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.