Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695238›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Mass media and risk factors for cancer: the under-representation of age.

Sara Macdonald, Yvonne Cunningham, Chris Patterson, Katie Robb, Una Macleod, Thomas Anker, Shona Hilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chilean Digital Press Coverage of the Relation between Diet and Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara MacdonaldInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, General Practice and Primary Care, 1 Horselethill Rd, Glasgow, G12 9LX, Scotland. sara.macdonald@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5380-6943
Yvonne CunninghamInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, General Practice and Primary Care, 1 Horselethill Rd, Glasgow, G12 9LX, Scotland.
Chris PattersonInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, Scotland.
Katie RobbInstitute of Health & WellbeingMental Health & Wellbeing, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Administration Building, 1st floor, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0XH, Scotland.
Una MacleodHull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, Univrsity of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Thomas AnkerAdam Smith Business School, Gilbert Scott Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland.
Shona HiltonInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, Scotland.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18606Cancer Research UK C16352/A18606Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing age is a risk factor for developing cancer. Yet, older people commonly underestimate this risk, are less likely to be aware of the early symptoms, and are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage cancer. Mass media are a key influence on the public's understanding health issues, including cancer risk. This study investigates how news media have represented age and other risk factors in the most common cancers over time.

methodsEight hundred articles about the four most common cancers (breast, prostate, lung and colorectal) published within eight UK national newspapers in 2003, 2004, 2013 and 2014 were identified using the Nexis database. Relevant manifest content of articles was coded quantitatively and subjected to descriptive statistical analysis in SPSS to identify patterns across the data.

resultsRisk was presented in half of the articles but this was rarely discussed in any depth and around a quarter of all articles introduced more than one risk factor, irrespective of cancer site. Age was mentioned as a risk factor in approximately 12% of all articles and this varied by cancer site. Age was most frequently reported in relation to prostate cancer and least often in articles about lung cancer. Articles featuring personal narratives more frequently focused on younger people and this was more pronounced in non-celebrity stories; only 15% of non-celebrity narratives were about people over 60. Other common risks discussed were family history and genetics, smoking, diet, alcohol, and environmental factors. Family history and genetics together featured as the most common risk factors. Risk factor reporting varied by site and family history was most commonly associated with breast cancer, diet with bowel cancer and smoking with lung cancer.

conclusionAge and older adults were largely obscured in media representation of cancer and cancer experience. Indeed common risk factors in general were rarely discussed in any depth. Our findings will usefully inform the development of future cancer awareness campaigns and media guidelines. It is important that older adults appreciate their heightened risk, particularly in the context of help-seeking decisions.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMass MediaMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsUnited KingdomAgeingContent analysisMediaNewspapwersRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID29695238
PMCPMC5918870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.