Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29695188›Full record

ArticleGlobal public health2019

The power of popular opinion in everyday primary care provision in urban India.

Radhika Gore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Global public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Learning analysis of health system resilience.Health policy and planning · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Radhika Gorea Department of Population Health , NYU School of Medicine , New York , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-6808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of power in health care settings in low- and middle-income countries largely describe providers' exercise of discretionary power in frontline roles, leaving under-specified the macro-institutions and mechanisms of power that drive health care outcomes. In this study I conceptualise providers' actions not in terms of discretionary power but as obligatory responses to 'authority' over them. Authority denotes an actor's rightfully held social power over others, who accept to follow that actor's directives. Explaining authority's workings entails studying how it operates from its subjects' perspectives. I analyse in particular the authority of popular opinion-which derives from citizens' claims to state services-over primary care doctors in municipal health facilities in Pune, India. Through year-long ethnographic fieldwork, I examine doctors' experience of popular opinion, social relations between doctors and communities, and the institutional history of state-provided urban primary care. Findings show that doctors routinely confront popular disregard for their services. But under conditions of long-standing neglect of municipal services, tenuous state-society relations, and an avid, widely preferred private sector, doctors appear unable and wary to deliver more than minimum clinical care. Their circumscribed response reflects mechanisms by which the power of popular opinion, under policy neglect, impels them to maintain a deficient status quo.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePrimary Health CarePublic OpinionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicMaleObservationPoliticsPower, PsychologicalPrivate SectorPublic SectorQualitative ResearchUrban Health Servicesauthorityhealth carepopular opinionPowerurban politics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.