Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29694406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on clinical decision-making at an urban emergency department in Tanzania.

Teri Ann Reynolds, Stas Amato, Irene Kulola, Chuan-Jay Jeffrey Chen, Juma Mfinanga, Hendry Robert Sawe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Point-of-care ultrasound competency of doctors working in Cape Town emergency departments.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Accuracy of portable ultrasound machines for obstetric biometry.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Teri Ann ReynoldsEmergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Stas AmatoSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4403-0247
Irene KulolaEmergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Chuan-Jay Jeffrey ChenSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Juma MfinangaEmergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hendry Robert SaweEmergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is an efficient, inexpensive, safe, and portable imaging modality that can be particularly useful in resource-limited settings. However, its impact on clinical decision making in such settings has not been well studied. The objective of this study is to describe the utilization and impact of PoCUS on clinical decision making at an urban emergency department in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

methodsThis was a prospective descriptive cross-sectional study of patients receiving PoCUS at Muhimbili National Hospital's Emergency Medical Department (MNH EMD). Data on PoCUS studies during a period of 10 months at MNH EMD was collected on consecutive patients during periods when research assistants were available. Data collected included patient age and sex, indications for ultrasound, findings, interpretations, and provider-reported diagnostic impression and disposition plan before and after PoCUS. Descriptive statistics, including medians and interquartile ranges, and counts and percentages, are reported. Pearson chi squared tests and p-values were used to evaluate categorical data for significant differences.

resultsPoCUS data was collected for 986 studies performed on 784 patients. Median patient age was 32 years; 56% of patients were male. Top indications for PoCUS included trauma, respiratory presentations, and abdomino-pelvic pain. The most frequent study types performed were eFAST, cardiac, and obstetric or gynaecologic studies. Overall, clinicians reported that the use of PoCUS changed either diagnostic impression or disposition plan in 29% of all cases. Rates of change in diagnostic impression or disposition plan increased to 45% in patients for whom more than one PoCUS study type was performed.

conclusionsIn resource-limited emergency care settings, PoCUS can be utilized for a wide range of indications and has substantial impact on clinical decision making, especially when more than one study type is performed.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingEmergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care TestingUltrasonographyUrban Health ServicesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyProspective StudiesPublic Health SurveillanceTanzaniaWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID29694406
PMCPMC5918616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.