Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29694403›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Bacillus megaterium strains derived from water and soil exhibit differential responses to the herbicide mesotrione.

Tatiane Dobrzanski, Fernanda Gravina, Bruna Steckling, Luiz R Olchanheski, Ricardo F Sprenger, Bruno C Espírito Santo, Carolina W Galvão, Péricles M Reche, Rosilene A Prestes, Sônia A V Pileggi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Herbicides Tolerance in aFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Tatiane DobrzanskiLaboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Fernanda GravinaLaboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Bruna StecklingLaboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Luiz R OlchanheskiLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Ecologia Microbiana, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo F SprengerSeparare - Núcleo de Cromatografia, Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno C Espírito SantoLaboratório de Biotecnologia Microbiana, Departamento de Biotecnologia, Genética e Biologia Celular, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Carolina W GalvãoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular Microbiana, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Péricles M RecheLaboratório de Pesquisa em Recursos Hídricos, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Enfermagem e Saúde Pública, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Rosilene A PrestesDepartamento Acadêmico, Campus Ponta Grossa, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, UTFPR, Campus Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Sônia A V PileggiLaboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Francinete R CamposLaboratório de Biociências e Espectrometria de Massas, Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Ricardo A AzevedoDepartamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Michael J SadowskyDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, and The Biotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Flávio L BeltrameLaboratório de Fitoterapia, Tecnologia e Química de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Marcos PileggiLaboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental, Setor de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-8295
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná · BRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intense use of herbicides for weed control in agriculture causes selection pressure on soil microbiota and water ecosystems, possibly resulting in changes to microbial processes, such as biogeochemical cycles. These xenobiotics may increase the production of reactive oxygen species and consequently affect the survival of microorganisms, which need to develop strategies to adapt to these conditions and maintain their ecological functionality. This study analyzed the adaptive responses of bacterial isolates belonging to the same species, originating from two different environments (water and soil), and subjected to selection pressure by herbicides. The effects of herbicide Callisto and its active ingredient, mesotrione, induced different adaptation strategies on the cellular, enzymatic, and structural systems of two Bacillus megaterium isolates obtained from these environments. The lipid saturation patterns observed may have affected membrane permeability in response to this herbicide. Moreover, this may have led to different levels of responses involving superoxide dismutase and catalase activities, and enzyme polymorphisms. Due to these response systems, the strain isolated from water exhibited higher growth rates than did the soil strain, in evaluations made in oligotrophic culture media, which would be more like that found in semi-pristine aquatic environments. The influence of the intracellular oxidizing environments, which changed the mode of degradation of mesotrione in our experimental model and produced different metabolites, can also be observed in soil and water at sites related to agriculture. Since the different metabolites may present different levels of toxicity, we suggest that this fact should be considered in studies on the fate of agrochemicals in different environments.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyWater MicrobiologyAdaptation, PhysiologicalBacillus megateriumBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCyclohexanonesEcosystemHerbicidesLipid PeroxidationMicrobial ViabilityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNACyclohexanonesHerbicidesmesotrioneRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID29694403
PMCPMC5918998
OpenAlexW2800525630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.