Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29694295›Full record

ArticleJournal of dual diagnosis

Psychological Functioning of Women Taking Illicit Drugs during Pregnancy and the Growth and Development of Their Offspring in Early Childhood.

Dana Serino Ma, Bradley S Peterson Md, Tove S Rosen Md

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dual diagnosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dana Serino Maa School of Psychology , Fairleigh Dickinson University , Teaneck , New Jersey , USA.
Bradley S Peterson Mdb Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Institute for the Developing Mind, Keck School of Medicine , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Tove S Rosen Mdc Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology , Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York , New York, USA.
Columbia College · CAFairleigh Dickinson University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

MRI of Infants Exposed Prenatally to Drugs of AbuseR01DA017820 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI PETERSON, BRADLEY S · 2004 to 2008
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this research was to assess psychosocial history and psychological functioning in women who use drugs during pregnancy and determine how drug exposure affects child development.

methodsPregnant women using marijuana (n = 38) and cocaine (n = 35) and receiving methadone maintenance (n = 24), along with a control (n = 49) group of pregnant women, were enrolled and followed every six months through 18-24 months postnatally.

resultsThere was a significantly higher incidence of mental illness among mothers in the drug-using groups. Prenatal stress and late-term drug severity scores were significantly higher in the mothers who used cocaine and methadone, who were also more likely to have abuse and incarceration histories. At 12 months, there were significantly higher rates of drug use in the marijuana group. Anxiety scores were highest in the methadone group. At 18 to 24 months, the methadone group reported significantly more stress, and methadone and marijuana groups had significantly higher anxiety and depression scores. At birth, neonates from the methadone and marijuana groups had significantly smaller head circumferences, with the smallest values in the methadone group. At one year, children in the cocaine group had significantly lower Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition (Bayley-III) cognitive and motor scores. At 18 to 24 months, children in the methadone group had significantly smaller head circumferences and Bayley-III cognitive scores. Children in the methadone and cocaine groups had a significantly higher incidence of atypical neurological examinations at 6 to 9 and 18 to 24 months.

conclusionsMothers in the methadone and cocaine groups presented with more severe prenatal drug use and psychosocial risk factors relative to women who used primarily marijuana. Children in the cocaine and methadone groups were neurologically atypical relative to others at study end. Mothers in the marijuana group reported chronic drug use as well as anxiety and depression at follow-up. At birth, children in the marijuana group were smaller, but this resolved with time. Similarly, children in the cocaine group had motor and cognitive delays that resolved by age two. Children in the methadone group had persistent growth and cognitive deficits. Their mothers demonstrated more anxiety, depression, and stress, the combination of which left these women and children liable to face ongoing psychosocial struggle and psychological distress. Dual interventions for mother and child should be considered in attempting to optimize outcome.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolCocaine-Related DisordersDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIllicit DrugsInfantLongitudinal StudiesMarijuana AbuseMental DisordersMethadoneMothersIllicit DrugsMethadoneNarcoticschild developmentmaternal drug usePrenatal drug exposurepsychosocialsocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID29694295
PMCPMC6202263
OpenAlexW2799651218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.