Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29693640›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Nanotechnological Strategies for Protein Delivery.

María Rocío Villegas, Alejandro Baeza, María Vallet-Regí

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Targeting the Inside of Cells with Biologicals: Chemicals as a Delivery Strategy.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

María Rocío VillegasDepartamento de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Farmacia, UCM, 28040 Madrid, Spain. mr.villegas@ucm.es.
Alejandro BaezaDepartamento de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Farmacia, UCM, 28040 Madrid, Spain. abaezaga@ucm.es.
María Vallet-RegíDepartamento de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Farmacia, UCM, 28040 Madrid, Spain. vallet@ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-4889

Funding

European Research Council 694160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of therapeutic proteins plays a fundamental role in the treatment of numerous diseases. The low physico-chemical stability of proteins in physiological conditions put their function at risk in the human body until they reach their target. Moreover, several proteins are unable to cross the cell membrane. All these facts strongly hinder their therapeutic effect. Nanomedicine has emerged as a powerful tool which can provide solutions to solve these limitations and improve the efficacy of treatments based on protein administration. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of different types of strategies employed for protein delivery, such as PEGylation, transport within liposomes or inorganic nanoparticles or their in situ encapsulation.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsHumansLiposomesModels, MolecularNanocapsulesNanomedicineNanoparticlesProteinsLiposomesNanocapsulesProteinsliposomesnanoparticlesPEGylationpolymeric nanocapsulesprotein delivery systemprotein therapy

Identifiers

PMID29693640
PMCPMC6100203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.