ReviewNutrients2018
Vitamin D Requirements for the Future-Lessons Learned and Charting a Path Forward.
Review in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to estimate the vitamin D dietary requirements in dark-skinned individuals resident at high latitude.European journal of nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with vitamin D-fortified foods to estimate Dietary Reference Values for vitamin D.European journal of nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Basal Vitamin D Status and Supplement Dose Are Primary Contributors to Maternal 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Response to Prenatal and Postpartum Cholecalciferol Supplementation.The Journal of nutrition · 2021Trial
- Differences in the dietary requirement for vitamin D among Caucasian and East African women at Northern latitude.European journal of nutrition · 2019Trial
- Vitamin D Daily versus Monthly Administration: Bone Turnover and Adipose Tissue Influences.Nutrients · 2018Trial
- Vitamin D-Do Diet Recommendations for Health Remain Strong?Current osteoporosis reports · 2024Review
- Prenatal vitamin D deficiency exposure leads to long-term changes in immune cell proportions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Vitamin D in Neurological Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Clinical Practice in the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency: A Central and Eastern European Expert Consensus Statement.Nutrients · 2022Review
- The Covid-19 infection: An opportunity to develop systematic vitamin D supplementation in psychiatry.L'Encephale · 2022Article
- Global differences in vitamin D status and dietary intake: a review of the data.Endocrine connections · 2022Review
- The COVID-19 era recalls the importance of ensuring sufficient vitamin D status in the general population.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2021Article
- New Roles for Vitamin D Superagonists: From COVID to Cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Review
- Food-based strategies for prevention of vitamin D deficiency as informed by vitamin D dietary guidelines, and consideration of minimal-risk UVB radiation exposure in future guidelines.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2020Review
- 25-Hydroxyvitamin D assay standardisation and vitamin D guidelines paralysis.Public health nutrition · 2020Article
- Consensus statement from 2Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020Article
- Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials among dark-skinned populations to estimate the dietary requirement for vitamin D.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- Vitamin D testing and treatment: a narrative review of current evidence.Endocrine connections · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimates of dietary requirements for vitamin D or Dietary Reference Values (DRV) are crucial from a public health perspective in providing a framework for prevention of vitamin D deficiency and optimizing vitamin D status of individuals. While these important public health policy instruments were developed with the evidence-base and data available at the time, there are some issues that need to be clarified or considered in future iterations of DRV for vitamin D. This is important as it will allow for more fine-tuned and truer estimates of the dietary requirements for vitamin D and thus provide for more population protection. The present review will overview some of the confusion that has arisen in relation to the application and/or interpretation of the definitions of the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA). It will also highlight some of the clarifications needed and, in particular, how utilization of a new approach in terms of using individual participant-level data (IPD), over and beyond aggregated data, from randomised controlled trials with vitamin D may have a key role in generating these more fine-tuned and truer estimates, which is of importance as we move towards the next iteration of vitamin D DRVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.