ArticleProteomes2018
A Proteomic View of
Article in Proteomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative proteomic and phenotypic responses of urinary pathogens to CuO/Cu₂O nanoparticles.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Roles of Pho regulon in bacterial pathogenicity.Virulence · 2025Review
- Host Cells Upregulate Phosphate Transporter PIT1 to InhibitInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Phosphorus starvation response and PhoB-independent utilization of organic phosphate sources byMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Phosphate (Pi) Transporter PIT1 Induces Pi Starvation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparison of Phenotype Nutritional Profiles and Phosphate Metabolism Genes in Four Serovars ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Regulatory Evolution of theJournal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Control of theEcoSal Plus · 2019Review
- PhoPR Contributes to Staphylococcus aureus Growth during Phosphate Starvation and Pathogenesis in an Environment-Specific Manner.Infection and immunity · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.