ReviewCritical reviews in food science and nutrition2019
Edible insects - defining knowledge gaps in biological and ethical considerations of entomophagy.
Review in Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards Bioethical and Functional Standards in the Slaughter Methods of Edible Insects: A Narrative Review.Insects · 2026Review
- Advances in porcine stem cell research and their applications in agriculture.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Edible Insects from the Perspective of Sustainability-A Review of the Hazards and Benefits.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Edible Insects: Global Research Trends, Biosafety Challenges, and Market Insights in the Mexican Context.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Potential of edible insects as alternative protein source for the older adults.Current research in food science · 2025Review
- A Model for Consumer Acceptance of Insect-Based Dog Foods among Adult UK Dog Owners.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The Potential of Edible Insects as a Safe, Palatable, and Sustainable Food Source in the European Union.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Bioactive Peptides Derived from Edible Insects: Effects on Human Health and Possible Applications in Dentistry.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Edible Insects in Thailand: An Overview of Status, Properties, Processing, and Utilization in the Food Industry.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Challenges in farmed insect welfare: Beyond the question of sentience.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2023Article
- Innovation in Alternative Food Sources: A Review of a Technological State-of-the-Art of Insects in Food Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Review
- Mycotoxin Metabolism by Edible Insects.Toxins · 2022Review
- Edible Insects as Food-Insect Welfare and Ethical Aspects from a Consumer Perspective.Insects · 2022Review
- Novel Foods and Sustainability as Means to Counteract Malnutrition in Madagascar.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A Proteomic- and Bioinformatic-Based Identification of Specific Allergens from Edible Insects: Probes for Future Detection as Food Ingredients.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- The Potential Role of Insects as Feed: A Multi-Perspective Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Review
- Nociceptive Pathway in the CockroachFrontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While seeking novel food sources to feed the increasing population of the globe, several alternatives have been discussed, including algae, fungi or
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.