Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29693354›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018

Proliferative Index (Ki67) for Prediction in Breast Duct Carcinomas

Shatha Th Ahmed, Azad M Ahmed, Dildar H Musa, Farhad K Sulayvani, Muzahm Al-Khyatt, Intisar S Pity

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fatty acid synthetase expression in triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shatha Th AhmedMBChB, Msc, PhD mol. Pathology/UK, College of Medicine,Ninevah University, Iraq. Email: shatha.ahmed@uoninevah.edu.iq
Azad M Ahmed
Dildar H Musa
Farhad K Sulayvani
Muzahm Al-Khyatt
Intisar S Pity
University of Duhok · IQShanghai FRP Research Institute (China) · CNUniversity of Mosul · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: To date, many tumor markers have been used to predict prognosis and therapeutic response in patients with breast cancer. The well established and routinely applied tumor markers are the estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor and Her2/neu-receptor. In the current study, we aimed to highlight any association of the proliferation index (Ki67) in breast infiltrative duct carcinoma with the tumor grade, tumor size and nodal status in addition to hormone receptor status. Tissue sections were stained immunohistochemically for Ki67 nuclear antigen, estrogen, progesterone and Her2/neu receptors using an automated Dako machine (Dako Denmark. There was a significant inverse relationship of Ki67 levels with ER and PR, while values were directly proportional to the tumor grade and Her2/neu status. No significant association was found between Ki67 and size of tumor or nodal status. Ki67 immunoexpression may offer an independent predictive tumor marker and for routine application in cases of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerimmunohistochemistryKi67

Identifiers

PMID29693354
PMCPMC6031788
OpenAlexW2789547005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.