ArticleBiotechnology progress2018
An examination of critical parameters in hybridization-based epigenotyping using magnetic microparticles.
Article in Biotechnology progress, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene-specific promoter methylation is involved in gene silencing and is an important cancer biomarker. Cancer-specific methylation patterns have been observed and clinically validated for numerous gene promoters, but the knowledge gleaned from this large body of work is currently under-utilized in the clinic. Methylation-specific PCR is currently the gold standard method for clinical methylation assessment, but several research groups have proposed hybridization-based techniques which could be simpler to implement and provide more accurate results. However, the sensitivity of this easier alternative must be improved dramatically in order to compete with methylation-specific PCR. Efficient sample capture is a key step in maximizing sensitivity, so here we investigate the key parameters involved in (i) maximizing the capture of gene-specific target DNA molecules at the surfaces of functionalized, magnetic microparticles and (ii) recognizing DNA methylation using an engineered methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) protein. The magnetic bead density, the probe concentration, and the MBD concentration were very important for maximizing detection, and other variables such as the hybridization time also impacted the target capture efficiency but had a smaller effect on the overall methylation assay. The effect of genomic DNA on the capture of the target sequence was also investigated, and model methylated vs. unmethylated target sequences could be distinguished in the presence of 1 ng/μL genomic DNA. The findings we report related to the underlying binding events involved in hybridization-based epigenotyping can be leveraged in combination with the many signal amplification and detection approaches that are currently being developed. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 34:1589-1595, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.