Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29693007›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Modelling Cooperative Tumorigenesis in

Helena E Richardson, Marta Portela

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Apoptosis inhibition restrains primary malignant traits in differentFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  9. PTP61F Mediates Cell Competition and Mitigates Tumorigenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Mutagenic Consequences of Sublethal Cell Death Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. In Silico Logical Modelling to Uncover Cooperative Interactions in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. ZnT7 RNAi favors RafOncogene · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Basic and Translational Models of Cooperative Oncogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena E RichardsonDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute of Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-4953
Marta PortelaDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neurobiology, Cajal Institute (CSIC), Avenida Doctor Arce, No. 37, 28002 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-962X
Instituto Cajal · ESLa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of human metastatic cancer is a multistep process, involving the acquisition of several genetic mutations, tumour heterogeneity, and interactions with the surrounding microenvironment. Due to the complexity of cancer development in mammals, simpler model organisms, such as the vinegar fly,

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogenesisDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansNeoplasmsOncogenesDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29693007
PMCPMC5859872
OpenAlexW2790362916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.