Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29692925›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2018

Reliable estimation of antimicrobial use and its evolution between 2010 and 2013 in French swine farms.

Anne Hémonic, Claire Chauvin, Didier Delzescaux, Fabien Verliat, Isabelle Corrégé, French Working Group ‘antimicrobials in the swine industry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Characterisation of Antimicrobial Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotic Use in European Pig Production: Less Is More.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial Use and Susceptibility of IndicatorFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Hémonic1IFIP-Institut du porc, Domaine de la Motte au Vicomte, 35104, 35651 Le Rheu, BP France.
Claire ChauvinAnses Laboratoire de Ploufragan-Plouzané, 53, 22440 Ploufragan, BP France.
Didier DelzescauxInaporc, 149 rue de Bercy, 75595, 12 Paris Cedex, France.
Fabien VerliatInaporc, 149 rue de Bercy, 75595, 12 Paris Cedex, France.
Isabelle Corrégé1IFIP-Institut du porc, Domaine de la Motte au Vicomte, 35104, 35651 Le Rheu, BP France.
French Working Group ‘antimicrobials in the swine industry
Institut du Porc · FRCollège de France · FRHendrix Genetics (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been a strong implication of both the French swine industry and the national authorities on reducing the use of antimicrobials in swine production since 2010. The annual monitoring of antimicrobial sales by the French Veterinary Medicines Agency (Anses-ANMV) provides estimates but not detailed figures on actual on-farm usage of antimicrobials in swine production.

resultsIn order to provide detailed information on the 2010 and 2013 antimicrobial use in the French swine industry, the methodology of cross-sectional retrospective study on a representative sample of at least 150 farms has been elected. The analysis of the collected data shows a strong and significant decrease in antimicrobial exposure of pigs between 2010 and 2013. Over three years, the average number of days of treatment significantly decreased by 29% in suckling piglets and by 19% in weaned piglets. In fattening pigs, the drop (- 29%) was not statistically significant. Only usage in sows did increase over that period (+ 17%, non-significant), which might be associated with the transition to group-housing of pregnant sows that took place at the time. Also, over that period, the use of third- and fourth generation cephalosporins in suckling piglets decreased by 89%, and by 82% in sows, which confirms that the voluntary moratorium on these classes of antimicrobials decided at the end of 2010 has been effectively implemented.

conclusionsThe methodology of random sampling of farms appears as a precise and robust tool to monitor antimicrobial use within a production animal species, able to fulfil industry and national authorities' objectives and requirements to assess the outcome of concerted efforts on antimicrobial use reduction. It demonstrates that the use of antimicrobials decreased in the French swine industry between 2010 and 2013, including the classes considered as critical for human medicine.

Indexed as

ALEAAntimicrobial consumptionDDD‘One health’Swine

Identifiers

PMID29692925
PMCPMC5902966
OpenAlexW2803123354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.