Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29692886›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2018

What are the optimum components in a care bundle aimed at reducing post-operative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients?

Sophie V Griffiths, Daniel H Conway, POPC-CB Investigators, Michael Sander, Ib Jammer, Michael P W Grocott, Ben C Creagh-Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Anesthetic management of geriatric patients.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophie V Griffiths1Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK.
Daniel H ConwayDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK.
POPC-CB Investigators
Michael Sander3Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Gießen, Giessen, Germany.
Ib Jammer4Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Michael P W Grocott6Critical Care Research Group, Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust/University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK.
Ben C Creagh-Brown7Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GU2 7XX UK.
Royal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEHaukeland University Hospital · NOManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-operative pulmonary complications (POPC) are common, predictable and associated with increased morbidity and mortality, independent of pre-operative risk. Interventions to reduce the incidence of POPC have been studied individually, but the use of a care bundle has not been widely investigated. The purpose of our work was to use Delphi consensus methodology and an independently chosen expert panel to formulate a care bundle for patients identified as being at high of POPC, as preparation towards an evaluation of its effectiveness at reducing POPC.

methodsWe performed a survey of members of the ESICM POIC section to inform a Delphi consensus and to share their opinions on a care bundle to reduce POPC, the POPC-CB. We formed a team of 36 experts to participate in and complete an email-based Delphi consensus over three rounds, leading to the formulation of the POPC-CB.

resultsThe survey had 362 respondents and informed the design of the Delphi consensus. The Delphi consensus resulted in a proposed POPC-CB that incorporates components before surgery-supervised exercise programmes and inspiratory muscle training, during surgery, low tidal volume ventilation with individualised PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure), use of routine monitoring to avoid hyperoxia and efforts made to limit neuromuscular blockade, and post-operatively, deep breathing exercises and elevation of the head of the bed.

conclusionA care bundle has been suggested for evaluation in surgical patients at high risk of POPC. Evaluation of feasibility of both implementation and effectiveness is now indicated.

Indexed as

Care bundleDelphi consensusInspiratory muscle trainingIntra-operative ventilationNosocomial pneumoniaPost-operative pulmonary complications

Identifiers

PMID29692886
PMCPMC5904979
OpenAlexW2806660255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.