Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29692816›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2018

The course of asthma during pregnancy in a recent, multicase-control study on respiratory health.

A Grosso, F Locatelli, E Gini, F Albicini, C Tirelli, I Cerveri, A G Corsico

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Determining the Clinical Course of Asthma in Pregnancy.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A Grosso1Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS "San Matteo" Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Vaile C. Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-8522
F Locatelli2Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
E Gini1Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS "San Matteo" Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Vaile C. Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
F Albicini1Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS "San Matteo" Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Vaile C. Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
C Tirelli1Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS "San Matteo" Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Vaile C. Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
I Cerveri1Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS "San Matteo" Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Vaile C. Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
A G Corsico1Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS "San Matteo" Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Vaile C. Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the years it has been widely stated that approximately one-third of asthmatic women experience worsening of the disease during pregnancy. However, the literature has not been reviewed systematically and the meta-analytic reviews include old studies. This study aimed to examine whether the prevalence of worsening asthma during pregnancy is still consistent with prior estimate or it has been reduced.

methodsA detailed Clinical Questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, medical history, medication, use of services, occupation, social status, home environment and lifestyle was administered to random samples of the Italian population in the frame of the Gene Environment Interactions in Respiratory Diseases (GEIRD) study. Only clinical data belong to 2.606 subjects that completed the clinical stage of the GEIRD study, were used for the present study.

resultsOut of 1.351 women, 284 self-reported asthma and 92 of them had at least one pregnancy. When we considered the asthma course during pregnancy, we found that 16 women worsened, 31 remained unchanged, 25 improved. Seven women had not the same course in the different pregnancies and 13 did not know. The starting age of ICS use almost overlaps with that of asthma onset in women with worsening asthma during pregnancy (19 years ± 1.4), unlike the other women who started to use ICS much later (30.3 years ± 12). In addition, the worsening of asthma was more frequent in women with an older age of onset of asthma (18 years ± 9 vs 13 years ± 10). Among women who completed the ACT during the clinical interview, the 50% of women who experienced worsening asthma during pregnancy (6/12) had an ACT score below 20.

conclusionAsthma was observed to worsen during pregnancy in a percentage much lower to that generally reported in all the previous studies. There is still room in clinical practice to further reduce worsening of asthma during pregnancy by improving asthma control, with a more structured approach to asthma education and management prepregnancy.

Indexed as

Asthma controlInhaled corticosteroidsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29692816
PMCPMC5902995
OpenAlexW2799657614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.